journal article·2020-05Open access

Mixed-mode fracture evaluation of aerospace grade honeycomb core sandwich specimens using the Double Cantilever Beam–Uneven Bending Moment test method

Vishnu Saseendran, Christian Berggreen

Abstract

Fracture testing of aerospace grade honeycomb core sandwich composites is carried out using the Double Cantilever Beam specimen loaded with Uneven Bending Moments, and a Double Cantilever Beam–Uneven Bending Moment test rig capable of applying pure moments is utilized. Specimens with carbon fiber-reinforced plastic face sheets are employed with a range of honeycomb core grades comprising of Nomex® and Kevlar paper. The sandwich specimens are reinforced with steel doublers to reduce excessive rotation of the face sheets. The mode mixity phase angle pertaining to a particular ratio of moments between the two arms of the Double Cantilever Beam specimen is determined using the numerical mode mixity method—Crack Surface Displacement Extrapolation method. For Nomex® honeycomb core sandwich specimens, it is observed that the mode I interface fracture toughness increases with increase in core density. The interface fracture toughnesses for Nomex®-based honeycomb cores are also compared against specimens with Kevlar paper-based honeycomb cores. Crack propagation is observed at the interface just beneath the meniscus layer for the majority of the tested specimen configurations. The Double Cantilever Beam–Uneven Bending Moment test methodology with the concept of direct application of moments on both crack flanks has proven to have a significant potential for mixed mode face/core fracture characterization of aerospace grade sandwich composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Funding

Danish Centre for Composite Structures and Materials

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Transportation Safety Board of Canada · 2007
2. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
3. 10.2514/1.556710.2514/1.5567 ↗
4. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90061-210.1016/0013-7944(94)90061-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90062-010.1016/0013-7944(94)90062-0 ↗
6. 10.1177/10996362990010010410.1177/109963629900100104 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199830936093710.1177/0021998309360937 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199831349235810.1177/0021998313492358 ↗
9. Zarda RP · Martin Maerietta Stud Task Report, EDF No MM0 TKR 10722739-001 · 1994
10. 10.1007/BF0027816210.1007/BF00278162 ↗
11. 10.1177/07316844910100040710.1177/073168449101000407 ↗
12. 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90425-510.1016/0921-5093(89)90425-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.008 ↗
14. 10.1177/109963620910453310.1177/1099636209104533 ↗
15. Ratcliffe J, Krueger R. Face sheet/core disbonding in sandwich composite components: A road map to standardization: Test method development. In: 11th International conference on sandwich structures. Dania Beach, Florida, 2016.
16. 10.1177/002199831140111610.1177/0021998311401116 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01551.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01551.x ↗
18. 10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.02010.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.020 ↗
20. 10.2514/1.J05176510.2514/1.J051765 ↗
21. 10.2514/1.J05603910.2514/1.J056039 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.021 ↗
23. 10.1177/109963620606177410.1177/1099636206061774 ↗
24. Rinker M · NASA/CR-2013-217959 NIA Rep No 2013-0115
25. CORMASTER Advanced Composites · 2016
26. CORMASTER Advanced Composites · 2016
27. Hexcel Product Data Sheet · 2016
28. 10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00025-110.1016/S0263-8223(97)00025-1 ↗
29. 3M Aerospace and Aircraft Maintenance Department · 2009
30. Uddeholm · 2014
31. 3M Industrial Adhesives and Tapes Division · 2017
32. ASTM-D3039/D3039M-08. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Internationa, 2014.
33. ASTM-D7078/7078M-12. Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by V-notched rail shear method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2012.
34. Schäuble R, Goldstein M, Petersilge M. Elastic properties of the CFRP facesheets in honeycomb core sandwich panels (DoSS/TFSanDis) . Internal report, Fraunhofer Institute for Microstructure of Materials and Systems, V554/2017, Halle, Germany, 2017.
35. Schäuble R, Goldstein M, Petersilge M. SCB fracture toughness tests on honeycomb sandwich material—Technical report . Internal report, Fraunhofer Institute for Microstructure of Materials and Systems, V793/2017, Halle, Germany, 2017.
36. Gibson LJ · 1999
37. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.008 ↗
38. Hähnel F, Bugiel A, Wolf K. Determination of macroscopic properties of different aramid paper based honeycomb cores . Technische Universität Dresden, Chair of Aircraft Engineering, Internal report ILR/LFT-IR17-19, Dresden, Germany, 2017.
39. Berggreen C, Saseendran V, Carlsson LA. A modified DCB-UBM test method for interfacial fracture toughness characterization of sandwich composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2018; 203: 208–23.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.036 ↗
40. MTS Systems Corporation · 2010
41. 10.1177/002199830606528510.1177/0021998306065285 ↗
42. 10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
43. ASTM D5528-13 Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.016 ↗
45. ANSYS Inc · 2015
46. Berggreen C. Damage tolerance of debonded sandwich structures . PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2004.
47. 10.1115/1.310192310.1115/1.3101923 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00111-710.1016/S0020-7683(02)00111-7 ↗