Large deformation of corrugated sandwich panels under three-point bending
Source abstract
Abstract
Corrugated sandwich panels are widely used in engineering applications for their excellent energy absorption and lightweight. In this research, the mechanical response of aluminum corrugated sandwich panels subjected to three-point bending is investigated experimentally, numerically, and theoretically. In the experiments, the sandwich panels were loaded under two conditions, namely base indentation and node indentation. A parametric study is conducted by ABAQUS/explicit to investigate the effects of geometric configurations (corrugation angle, core height, and core thickness) on the deformation mode, peak force, and energy absorption. Both peak force and specific energy absorption vary with the geometric parameters. Theoretical models are further developed to predict the force–displacement curves of the panels under the two loading conditions. The theoretically predicted crushing force is in good agreement with both the experimental and simulated results. Finally, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II is adopted to optimize the geometric configuration to improve the specific energy absorption and reduce the weight of corrugated sandwich panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Material Properties and Processing · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Funding
Rail Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Metschkow B. · Polish Marit Res · 2006 · 5
2. Harris CE · NASA Tech Memo · 2001 · 39 · 1
3. 10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_110.1007/1-4020-3848-8_1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.006 ↗
5. 10.1177/109963621668216610.1177/1099636216682166 ↗
6. Helms H · Int J Life Cycle Assess · 2007 · 12 · 58
7. Wennberg D. Light-weighting methodology in rail vehicle design through introduction of load carrying sandwich panels . PhD Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011.
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.13010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.130 ↗
9. 10.1177/109963621456519010.1177/1099636214565190 ↗
10. 10.1177/109963621773125510.1177/1099636217731255 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.07110.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.071 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.01210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.012 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.217-218.158410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.217-218.1584 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.05910.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.059 ↗
15. 10.1080/13588265.2012.69021510.1080/13588265.2012.690215 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.039 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.06410.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.064 ↗
18. 10.1590/1679-7825290510.1590/1679-78252905 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00246-510.1016/S0263-8223(02)00246-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00131-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00131-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00024-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00024-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.07310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.073 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10409-007-0096-z10.1007/s10409-007-0096-z ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.01410.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.014 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.022 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.05710.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.057 ↗
29. Allen HG. · 1966
30. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.02.02710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.02.027 ↗
31. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.038 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.07410.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.074 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.10.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.10.004 ↗