Fracture behavior of Al/GFRP/Al sandwich panels under uniaxial static and impact tensile loadings
Source abstract
Abstract
The present work aims to comprehensively evaluate the fracture behavior of sandwich panels made of fiber-metal laminates (FMLs) under static and impact tensile loadings. Smooth, cracked, and notched specimens are prepared for static tensile, mode I translaminar fracture toughness, and tensile-impact tests. The FMLs’ inner material is epoxy-reinforced by long glass fiber (FRP) and enveloped with 1050 aluminum plates. The investigation parameters comprise the number of layers, the insertion of the [90°] layers within [Al/0 ° /Al] and [Al/0°/0°/Al] FML specimens, the fiber volume fraction, the strain rate, and the lay-up technique. The findings illustrate that increasing [0°] layers or fiber volume fraction enhances all the mechanical properties determined through the abovementioned tests. Additionally, the fibrous polymeric core skinned by aluminum plates displayed two dissimilar types of intralaminar cracking, namely, matrix cracking, followed by plastic degradation within the aluminum plates that ends with a total split through aluminum plates, and interlaminar damage arising between the aluminum plates and the FRP core. Further, inserting [90°] layers into the middle or directly adjacent to the FML specimens’ skins reduced their strength and toughness under static or impact tensile loading and their mode I translaminar fracture toughness. The sandwich lay-up technique, providing a good bond between the core and the skins, demonstrated better performance than the hand lay-up, providing a perfect bond between them. Therefore, the lay-up of FMLs should adopt the sandwich lay-up technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Materials Engineering Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/109963621878198110.1177/1099636218781981 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10656010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106560 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11514210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115142 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.01610.1016/j.msea.2005.08.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10685910.1016/j.tws.2020.106859 ↗
6. 10.1177/073168442091599610.1177/0731684420915996 ↗
7. Vogelesang LB Marissen R Schijve J. A new fatigue resistant material: Aramid reinforced aluminum laminate (ARALL) Delft University of Technology Netherlands 1981 pp. 1–39. Report LR-322. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a8f8abcf-56ec-423c-b36c-e2d49fc44e18
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.03.02010.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.03.020 ↗
10. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00552.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00552.x ↗
11. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00138-310.1016/S0013-7944(03)00138-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.02410.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.024 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2937810.1002/pc.29378 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jer.2025.01.00510.1016/j.jer.2025.01.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11060810.1016/j.tws.2023.110608 ↗
17. 10.1177/1099636225132104810.1177/10996362251321048 ↗
18. 10.3390/buildings1210156610.3390/buildings12101566 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.04610.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.046 ↗
20. 10.1177/0021998324123109910.1177/00219983241231099 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10437310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104373 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10695210.1016/j.tws.2020.106952 ↗
23. 10.21926/rpm.230202110.21926/rpm.2302021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10816210.1016/j.tws.2021.108162 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10767410.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107674 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10731810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107318 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10757810.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107578 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11744910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117449 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1318312910.3390/polym13183129 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.004 ↗
31. 10.1108/FEBE-03-2024-000610.1108/FEBE-03-2024-0006 ↗
32. ASTM D3039-17. Standard test methods for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2017. https://www.astm.org
33. Plastics determination of tensile impact strength. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva Switzerland 2004. German version EN ISO 8256. www.iso.org
34. ASTM D3171-15. Standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2015. https://www.astm.org
35. 10.1007/s13726-018-0676-810.1007/s13726-018-0676-8 ↗
36. David B. Elementary engineering fracture mechanics. Boston, MA, USA: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982.
37. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10362410.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103624 ↗
38. Harichandan A, Kumar KV. Study on tensile behaviour of carbon jute aluminium-fibre metal laminates. Int J Mech Production Eng 2016; 4(7): 38–42.
39. She C, Xie J, Mao Z, et al. Molding preparation and tensile properties test of carbon fiber reinforced aluminum laminates. Materia 2023; 28: e20230250.
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11140810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111408 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11682010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116820 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.00310.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.003 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.02.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.02.006 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0263-8231(03)00107-110.1016/S0263-8231(03)00107-1 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.008 ↗
46. 10.1177/002199831770295410.1177/0021998317702954 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.01810.1016/j.msea.2015.10.018 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11200410.1016/j.tws.2024.112004 ↗
49. 10.1007/s13726-013-0210-y10.1007/s13726-013-0210-y ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cja.2015.07.00210.1016/j.cja.2015.07.002 ↗
51. 10.1177/089270571140816510.1177/0892705711408165 ↗
52. Liaw BM Liu YX Villars EA. Impact damage mechanisms in fiber-metal laminates. In: Proceedings of the SEM annual conference on experimental and applied mechanics Portland Oregon 4–6 June 2001 pp. 536–539.
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.04410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.044 ↗
54. Mahesh V, Mahesh V. Development and mechanical characterization of light weight fiber metal laminate using jute, kenaf and aluminium. Mech Advanced Compos Struct 2024; 11(2): 259–270.
55. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.06.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2005.06.002 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11777210.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117772 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.04.011 ↗
58. 10.1051/jp4:1997317610.1051/jp4:19973176 ↗
59. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.535-536.4810.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.535-536.48 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11649310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116493 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.pes.2024.10001510.1016/j.pes.2024.100015 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11412310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114123 ↗