journal article·2025-01Open access

Preliminary investigation of the large-scale sandwich decks with graded 3D printed auxetic core

Lucija Stepinac, Josip Galić

Abstract

This research presents an innovative sandwich bridge deck system inspired by triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures for load-bearing applications. The deck features a parametrically designed graded gyroid core, optimized through structural optimization to achieve a 10% relative density. The core was manufactured using Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) and bonded with tempered glass flanges. Numerical analysis was performed using Abaqus software with an elastic-plastic material model based on tension tests, offering a simplified yet effective approach compared to the more complex analysis possible with custom VUMAT subroutines. A single scaled prototype was produced and subjected to a three-point bending test. The results demonstrated successful bonding between the sheets and core but revealed challenges such as premature shear failure of the polymeric core, crack propagation between print beads, and compression-induced failure of the glass flanges. A size effect was identified, as tension tests were performed at a much finer resolution than the core printing, leading to a drop in the material’s mechanical properties. These failure modes were correlated with numerical predictions, underscoring the need for further investigation into thermo-mechanical effects on 3D printed materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-475510.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-4755 ↗
2. Serin G, Kahya M, Unver HO, et al. A review of additive manufacturing technologies. In 17th International Conference on machine design and production, 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322745252
3. 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-127810.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1278 ↗
4. 10.1007/s41693-023-00103-910.1007/s41693-023-00103-9 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000203410.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002034 ↗
6. 10.1061/9780784485163.01510.1061/9780784485163.015 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000378710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003787 ↗
8. 10.1080/15397734.2022.210753810.1080/15397734.2022.2107538 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:7(823)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:7(823) ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00610.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.404054610.1115/1.4040546 ↗
12. 10.1080/17452759.2022.209001510.1080/17452759.2022.2090015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11408310.1016/j.cma.2021.114083 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.02710.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10305110.1016/j.addma.2022.103051 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11066510.1016/j.matdes.2022.110665 ↗
17. 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90056-010.1016/0021-9290(89)90056-0 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20170570810.1002/adma.201705708 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10000410.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10747110.1016/j.tws.2021.107471 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11339110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113391 ↗
22. 10.3390/jcs603007110.3390/jcs6030071 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11730310.1016/j.jsv.2022.117303 ↗
24. 10.1002/adem.20230081310.1002/adem.202300813 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11617410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116174 ↗
26. 10.3390/buildings1311283510.3390/buildings13112835 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1608319610.3390/ma16083196 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eml.2022.10170810.1016/j.eml.2022.101708 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199832199073410.1177/0021998321990734 ↗
30. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03162410.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031624 ↗
31. ASTM International · ASTM Int · 2020 · 1
32. 10.1520/C039310.1520/C0393 ↗
33. 10.1080/15376494.2019.170043310.1080/15376494.2019.1700433 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.031 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11297010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112970 ↗
36. 10.3390/ma1622709110.3390/ma16227091 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00034-410.1016/S0263-8223(01)00034-4 ↗
38. 10.1080/15397734.2021.198137810.1080/15397734.2021.1981378 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10747110.1016/j.tws.2021.107471 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10857710.1016/j.matdes.2020.108577 ↗
41. 10.1080/15376494.2023.226755110.1080/15376494.2023.2267551 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.10040910.1016/j.rineng.2022.100409 ↗
43. 10.3390/app1018637410.3390/app10186374 ↗
44. Allen G · 2020
45. Smith M · 2009
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11005010.1016/j.matdes.2021.110050 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.004 ↗
48. SIST EN ISO 527-2:2012—Plastics—Determination of tensile properties—Part 2: Test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. 2012.
49. 10.3390/polym1415321610.3390/polym14153216 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594810.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948 ↗
51. 10.1080/15376494.2023.226755110.1080/15376494.2023.2267551 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11208310.1016/j.matdes.2023.112083 ↗
53. Smith M · 2009