Initial performance assessment of 3D printed thin walled structures for spacecraft applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Sandwich panels are the fundamental structural element in a wide range of applications, including in satellite primary structures. While sandwich constructions are very efficient, their complex multi-material assembly leaves room for further optimisation of the core volume and improvement in the integration phase. One key technology that can enable the transition to multifunctional sandwich panel cores tailored to certain applications is the additive manufacturing (AM) of satellite primary structure sandwich panel cores. This paper investigates the feasibility of replacing the baseline Aluminium honeycomb core with a core printed out of AlSi10Mg through Powder Bed Fusion. Sandwich panels with carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) facesheets and printed honeycomb cores as well as fully printed corrugated panels are produced and tested under three point bending (3PB) and compression as part of the EU funded ReDSHIFT project. The Instron 5560 (3PB) and 4204 (compression) are used to perform the experiments that follow the ASTM C393-11 and C365 standards. When compared against the baseline CFRP-AL panels, the 3D printed honeycomb cores carry up to twice as much load per unit mass in bending and four times as much in compression, while also being stiffer. The fully printed corrugates samples are weaker than the honeycombs, but in conjunction with the honeycomb geometry may present a promising avenue for developing multifunctional cores. While limitations with current metal printing technology prevent AM cores from matching the mass of baseline designs, the superior specific performance and geometrical freedom make printed cores a promising design alternative.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Funding
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.008 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsta.2005.169710.1098/rsta.2005.1697 ↗
3. Dumitrescu A · Jnl of Sandwich Structures Materials · 2023 · 109963622312109
4. Wang X · Addit Manuf · 2018 · 20 · 189
5. 10.1016/j.eml.2017.09.01610.1016/j.eml.2017.09.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.03710.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.037 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10781010.1016/j.tws.2021.107810 ↗
8. 10.3390/polym1414288510.3390/polym14142885 ↗
9. 10.1007/s43452-020-00095-110.1007/s43452-020-00095-1 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11665-021-06419-310.1007/s11665-021-06419-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11511310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115113 ↗
12. Takezawa A · Addit Manuf · 2018 · 22 · 634
13. 10.1002/adem.20200144010.1002/adem.202001440 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11665-021-05809-x10.1007/s11665-021-05809-x ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1422706210.3390/ma14227062 ↗
16. 10.3390/met1105068610.3390/met11050686 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00170-020-06104-010.1007/s00170-020-06104-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.02310.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.023 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-021-07089-010.1007/s00170-021-07089-0 ↗
20. Algardh JK · Addit Manuf · 2016 · 12 · 45
21. Piascik B · NASA Technology Area · 2012
22. NASA · 2015
23. NASA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 2015
24. Guerrero J · 2001
25. 10.1177/058310240707739710.1177/0583102407077397 ↗
26. Roberts SC, Aglietti GS. Design of a multifunctional spacecraft structure using plastic lithium-ion batteries. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Victoria: ARC, 2008, p. 5966.10.2514/6.2008-5966 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.03.00410.1016/j.actaastro.2010.03.004 ↗
28. Walker SJI, Cook A, Foster JA et al. Final development and testing of a multifunctional power structure for the ROV-E project. In: International conference on noise and vibration engineering and international conference on uncertainty in structural dynamics, leuven, Belgium. Belgium: ISMA, 2014, pp. 895–909.
29. Jesus M · Technical report · 2008
30. Tschepe C, Lender S, Ruess F et al. Development of modular multi-functional structure panel. In: European conference on spacecraft structures, materials and environmental testing (ECSSMET). Europe: ECSSMET, 2021.
31. Montano Rejas Z, Keimer R, Geier S et al. Design and manufacturing of a multifunctional highly integrated satellite panel structure. In: European Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Environmental Testing (ECSSMET). Europe: ECSSMET, 2021.
32. Barnett DM · DS1 Technology Validation Report, JPL · 1999
33. Joseph Y · Technical report · 2001
34. Schubert M · DLRK2017 · 2017
35. Schubert M, Perfetto S, Dafnis A et al. Multifunctional and lightweight load-bearing composite structures for satellites. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, volume 233. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences, 2018, p. 00019.10.1051/matecconf/201823300019 ↗
36. Schubert M, Dafnis A. Multifunctional load-bearing aerostructures with integrated space debris protection. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, volume 304. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences, 2019, p. 07003.10.1051/matecconf/201930407003 ↗
37. 10.2514/3.1086110.2514/3.10861 ↗
38. 10.1177/109963621769749310.1177/1099636217697493 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.15810.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.158 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.taml.2016.01.00110.1016/j.taml.2016.01.001 ↗
41. Rossi A · 2019 · 1
42. Aluminium 5056-O properties, 2023. https://shorturl.at/dhvBP