Experimental and numerical analysis of mechanical characteristics of fused deposition processed honeycomb fabricated from PLA or ULTEM 9085
Source abstract
Abstract
Approach for mechanical characteristic experimental analysis of honeycomb core manufactured by fused deposition modelling is suggested. Experimental analyses of shear and tension of the honeycombs specimens fabricated from PLA and ULTEM 9085 materials are performed. The experimental studies are accompanied by the finite element simulations of the shear and the tension experiments of honeycomb core. As follows from experimental and numerical studies, both the geometrical nonlinearity and plasticity behavior of the material must be accounted for the honeycomb tension analysis. The force-displacement response of honeycomb tension has nonlinear behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine
National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Podgorny Institute for Mechanical Engineering, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Department of Technical Systems, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkov, Ukraine
Department of Aircraft Strength, National Aerospace University N.Ye. Zhukovsky “KhAI”, Kharkov, Ukraine
National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kiev, Ukraine
Funding
National Research Foundation of Ukraine
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ast.2020.10608110.1016/j.ast.2020.106081 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.02810.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.028 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.031 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100540-8.00015-710.1016/B978-0-08-100540-8.00015-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.04166-710.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.04166-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.04010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.040 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.01910.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.02810.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.028 ↗
10. Zhang P · J Appli Pol Scien · 2018 · 135
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.024 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10443-010-9184-510.1007/s10443-010-9184-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.011 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1201004710.3390/polym12010047 ↗
15. Bhandaria S · Addit Manuf · 2018 · 22 · 187
16. 10.1115/1.283058210.1115/1.2830582 ↗
17. Daniel IM · 2006
18. 10.1007/BF0231996210.1007/BF02319962 ↗
19. ASTM D 3518 · 2018
20. ASTM D 3039 · 2017
21. 10.1177/00219983680020010210.1177/002199836800200102 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.11.007 ↗
23. 10.1017/978131642289210.1017/9781316422892 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10778-006-0072-510.1007/s10778-006-0072-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.09.00410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.09.004 ↗
26. 10.1109/IEPS.2018.855954610.1109/IEPS.2018.8559546 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10778-014-0633-y10.1007/s10778-014-0633-y ↗
28. 2009
29. Perez DB · 3D Printing and Additive Manuf · 2021 · 8