Experimental and numerical investigation on the anti-penetration performance of metallic sandwich plates for marine applications
Source abstract
Abstract
To predict the anti-penetration performance of protective structures, the ballistic performance of sandwich plates with steel face-sheet and aluminum foam core, the quasi-static compressive experiments of four different aluminum foam are performed and analyzed. The failure mechanism, mechanical parameters, and modified constitutive model are obtained. The virtual tests using numerical simulation were carried out in different penetration velocities based on quasi-static experimental constitutive parameters. Influence of projectile shape, face-sheet thickness, core thickness, and core densities on the residual velocity and plastic deformation of sandwich plates are discussed, while typical penetration failure modes and deformation mechanism are presented and analyzed. The failure modes of sandwich plates are different for hemisphere- and blunted-nosed projectile and the projectile shape influence is significant for ballistic performance when the penetration velocity approaches ballistic limit. The ballistic limit increases with increase of face-sheet or core thickness, core density and which shows an approximate linear relationship.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Science, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Group Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China
Funding
the Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province · the Key Laboratory Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-610.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
2. Wen HM · Key Eng Mater · 1998 · 141 · 501
3. Yi SC · Math Probl Eng · 2017 · 2017 · 1
4. 10.1177/002199831558465010.1177/0021998315584650 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.00710.1016/j.tws.2018.06.007 ↗
6. Tian A · Int J Struct Stabil Dyn
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.04810.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.048 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.02110.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.11.01910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.11.019 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.11.02010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.11.020 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.09110.1016/j.msea.2012.01.091 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ast.2013.12.00510.1016/j.ast.2013.12.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.028 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.01210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.012 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.01310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.09010.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.090 ↗
24. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
25. Guo Z. · 2012
26. Gibson LJ · 1999
27. 10.1002/pen.2004110.1002/pen.20041 ↗
28. Hallquist JO, Whirley RG. DYNA3D user’s manual: (nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures in three dimensions): revision 5[J], 1989.10.2172/5920559 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0894-9166(16)30013-110.1016/S0894-9166(16)30013-1 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.363656610.1115/1.3636566 ↗