journal article·2021-03

Nonlinear forced vibration of graphene/piezoelectric sandwich nanoplates subjected to a mechanical shock

Majid Ghadiri, S Hamed S Hosseini

Publisher page

Abstract

The nonlinear frequency response of graphene/piezoelectric sandwich nanoplates under the electric voltage exerted on piezoelectric layer and a shock force pulse is the objective of the present paper. First, using von Karman nonlinear relations, Kelvin–Voigt model, piezoelectric nonlocal elasticity theory and Hamilton's principle, the nonlinear governing differential equation of motion is derived. In the second step, to transform the partial differential equations to the ordinary differential ones, Galerkin technique is employed. Then, governing equation is solved based on multiple scale method. At the end, modulation equation of graphene/piezoelectric sandwich nanoplate is obtained. Emphasizing the effect of the electric voltage and the shock force pulse, the results for fundamental frequency response are obtained. The results emphasize that the exciting loads can cause multivaluedness in frequency response and intensify the jump phenomenon. Also, they can be effective to amplify the vibration behavior of the structure to make resonance. In addition, the thickness of piezoelectric layer plays a significant role in nonlinear frequency response.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2008.8310.1038/nnano.2008.83 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2007.45110.1038/nnano.2007.451 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11071-018-4055-y10.1007/s11071-018-4055-y ↗
4. 10.1080/10408436.2016.114285810.1080/10408436.2016.1142858 ↗
5. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/10/10520210.1088/0957-4484/23/10/105202 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep0178210.1038/srep01782 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.113683610.1126/science.1136836 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.193210.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1932 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.12680510.1103/PhysRevLett.88.126805 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa550b10.1088/1361-665X/aa550b ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.00810.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.05.02710.1016/j.sna.2017.05.027 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.500891810.1063/1.5008918 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.470975410.1063/1.4709754 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.071 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.03110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.031 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.01310.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.013 ↗
19. Kundalwal SI, Shingare KB, Rathi A. Effect of flexoelectricity on the electromechanical response of graphene nanocomposite beam. Int J Mech Mater Des 2018; 1–24.10.1007/s10999-018-9417-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.040 ↗
22. 10.1177/095440621562783010.1177/0954406215627830 ↗
23. 10.1177/107754631880680010.1177/1077546318806800 ↗
24. Ghorbanpour Arani A, Zamani MH. Investigation of electric field effect on size-dependent bending analysis of functionally graded porous shear and normal deformable sandwich nanoplate on silica Aerogel foundation. J Sandw Struct Mater . Epub ahead of print 31 July 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1099636217721405.10.1177/1099636217721405 ↗
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/10500110.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105001 ↗
26. 10.1177/107754631454372610.1177/1077546314543726 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00707-016-1716-010.1007/s00707-016-1716-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.06.00210.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.06.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.088 ↗
30. 10.1177/1045389X1772103910.1177/1045389X17721039 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00339-017-1156-210.1007/s00339-017-1156-2 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00707-014-1297-810.1007/s00707-014-1297-8 ↗
33. Arefi M, Zamani MH, Kiani M. Smart electrical and magnetic stability analysis of exponentially graded shear deformable three-layered nanoplate based on nonlocal piezo-magneto-elasticity theory. J Sandw Struct Mater . Epub ahead of print 28 February 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1099636218760667.10.1177/1099636218760667 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.07.02710.1016/j.ast.2017.07.027 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.01610.1016/j.tws.2017.01.016 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.01610.1016/j.ast.2017.03.016 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.015 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10483-018-2319-810.1007/s10483-018-2319-8 ↗
39. 10.1177/095440621875645110.1177/0954406218756451 ↗
40. 10.1016/0020-7225(72)90039-010.1016/0020-7225(72)90039-0 ↗
41. 10.1016/0020-7225(83)90058-710.1016/0020-7225(83)90058-7 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.067 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.03010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.030 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.20543010.1103/PhysRevB.70.205430 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.033 ↗
46. 10.4208/aamm.2015.m89910.4208/aamm.2015.m899 ↗
47. Ehyaei J · Adv Nano Res · 2017 · 5 · 141
48. 10.1080/01495739.2016.116068410.1080/01495739.2016.1160684 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2013.12.00610.1016/j.euromechsol.2013.12.006 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.05110.1016/j.snb.2013.07.051 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.006 ↗
52. 10.1177/095440621142899710.1177/0954406211428997 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.tws.2007.08.01610.1016/j.tws.2007.08.016 ↗
54. 10.1177/095440621245380810.1177/0954406212453808 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.053 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.11.01010.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.11.010 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.06.00510.1016/j.jsv.2012.06.005 ↗
58. Jomehzadeh E · World Acad Sci Eng Technol · 2011 · 5 · 6
59. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.09.02710.1016/j.jsv.2016.09.027 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.04.003 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.03110.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.031 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.apm.2017.06.01910.1016/j.apm.2017.06.019 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.00710.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.007 ↗
64. 10.1016/0020-7225(72)90070-510.1016/0020-7225(72)90070-5 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.33280310.1063/1.332803 ↗
66. Reddy JN. · 2013
67. 10.1201/978084938416510.1201/9780849384165 ↗
68. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/02501810.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025018 ↗
69. 10.1017/CBO978051162672210.1017/CBO9780511626722 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.physe.2014.11.00710.1016/j.physe.2014.11.007 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.physb.2012.06.03510.1016/j.physb.2012.06.035 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.07544310.1103/PhysRevB.72.075443 ↗
73. 10.1016/0022-460X(76)90431-410.1016/0022-460X(76)90431-4 ↗
74. 10.1115/1.403810710.1115/1.4038107 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.01910.1016/j.apm.2014.07.019 ↗
76. 10.1177/107754631351476310.1177/1077546313514763 ↗
77. 10.1088/0960-1317/22/9/09500310.1088/0960-1317/22/9/095003 ↗
78. 10.1109/JMEMS.2007.89670110.1109/JMEMS.2007.896701 ↗
79. Nayfeh AH · 2008
80. Nourbakhsh H · Appl Mech Mater · 2012 · 110 · 4178
81. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.00710.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.007 ↗
82. 10.1115/1.401139610.1115/1.4011396 ↗
83. 10.1016/0020-7403(63)90026-210.1016/0020-7403(63)90026-2 ↗
84. 10.2514/3.904410.2514/3.9044 ↗
85. 10.1115/1.342437210.1115/1.3424372 ↗
86. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4001(200003)80:3<183::AID-ZAMM183>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1521-4001(200003)80:3<183::AID-ZAMM183>3.0.CO;2-P ↗