Compression of structural foam materials – Experimental and numerical assessment of test procedure and specimen size effects
Source abstract
Abstract
This study was initiated based on the observation that standardized test methods for flatwise compression of foam materials, give significantly different test results for the measured moduli, and that these standards to date lack adequate instructions on how the strain should be measured and what specimen size should be used. A brief review of previous work shows that existing test methodologies provide significantly different results for the compressive moduli of foams depending on how the strains are measured. A thorough experimental study of the out-of-plane compressive properties is conducted on three different closed-cell foam materials, where strains measured with two different extensometer placements, and with digital image correlation, come out significantly differently. A parametric study is also performed showing that the results vary considerably with in-plane specimen dimensions, indicating effects of finite size and localized strain at edges. Both stochastic amorphous and homogenized finite element models of foam back the experimental observations by illustrating the effects of finite size and various boundary conditions on the measured properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Division of Lightweight Structures, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ · 1988
2. 10.1098/rspa.1982.008810.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
3. Weaire D · 1999
4. 10.1002/3527606696.ch1a10.1002/3527606696.ch1a ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.013 ↗
6. 10.1177/109963620300500158410.1177/1099636203005001584 ↗
7. 10.1177/109963620300500158510.1177/1099636203005001585 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.09.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2003.09.006 ↗
9. 10.1046/j.1475-1305.2002.00029.x10.1046/j.1475-1305.2002.00029.x ↗
10. 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00277-210.1016/S0020-7683(99)00277-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00061-810.1016/S0142-9418(03)00061-8 ↗
12. Motuku M, Vaidya UK, Rodgers R, et al. Characterization of static compressive, low velocity impact and high strain rate impact response of foam core sandwich composites: effect of foam core density and facesheet thickness. In: 13th International conference on composite materials , Beijing China, 25–29 June 2001.
13. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.005 ↗
14. 10.1177/0021955X0809511310.1177/0021955X08095113 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-011-5649-710.1007/s10853-011-5649-7 ↗
16. 10.1177/109963620606512610.1177/1099636206065126 ↗
17. 10.1177/109963620810399210.1177/1099636208103992 ↗
18. Technical Standard ASTM: D1621-16. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. 2016.
19. Technical Standard ASTM C365/C365M - 16. Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. 2016.
20. Rajput MS, Burman M and Hallström S. Distinguishing between strain measurement procedures during compressive testing of foam materials. In: 20th International conference on composite materials , Copenhagen, Denmark, 19–24 July 2015.
21. Yalkin HE · J Sandw Struct Mater · 2016 · 19 · 1
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.12.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.12.005 ↗
24. Walz T. Review of the state of the art of whole field optical measurement techniques for strain analysis. In: Proceedings SPIE 8321, Seventh international symposium on precision engineering measurements and instrumentation , Yunnan China, 7 August 2011, pp.1–12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.912721.10.1117/12.912721 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177) ↗
26. Technical Standard ASTM D 1623 - 78. Standard test method for tensile and tensile adhesion properties of rigid cellular plastics. 1995.
27. ABAQUS 6.11, Hibbit, Carlsson and Sorensen. 2003.
28. 10.1177/0021955X1350384810.1177/0021955X13503848 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.02510.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.025 ↗