Competitive formation of ternary metallic glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
In an effort to elucidate the formation of metallic glasses and glass-matrix composites in ternary eutectic systems, we have applied the competitive growth principle with the premise that glass formation competes with the growth of all the possible crystalline structures. It is found that each crystalline structure defines a characteristic glass-forming velocity beyond which its growth will be completely suppressed by glass formation. A glass-forming composition diagram, as thus derived, indicates that the formation of a full glass is limited by the complete suppression of growth of the primary competing structure that has the greatest characteristic glass-forming velocity. Moreover, the formation of two types of glass-matrix composites, i.e., single-phase dendrites plus a glass, and single-phase dendrites plus a two-phase eutectic plus a glass, has been predicted as a result of the incomplete suppression of growth of the primary and/or secondary competing structures. A new criterion gauging the globally optimum glass-forming ability in a ternary eutectic system is also derived.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Turnbull · Contemp Phys · 1969 · 10 · 47310.1080/00107516908204405 ↗
2. Ulhmann · J Non-Cryst Solids · 1972 · 7 · 33710.1016/0022-3093(72)90269-4 ↗
3. Boettinger WJ. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on rapidly quenched metals. Sendai; 1981, p. 99.
4. Boettinger · 1982 · 15
5. Johnson · MRS Bull · 1999 · 24 · 4210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
6. Hays · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
7. Tan · Acta Mater · 2003 · 52 · 455110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00291-X ↗
8. Hu · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 5610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00438-X ↗
9. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 402910.1063/1.1751219 ↗
10. Ma · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 86 · 19190610.1063/1.1922570 ↗
11. Wang · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 296910.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.012 ↗
12. Inoue · Mater Trans JIM · 1995 · 36 · 142010.2320/matertrans1989.36.1420 ↗
13. Jackson · Trans AIME · 1968 · 242 · 1275
14. Kurz · Int Met Rev · 1979 · 5–6 · 177
15. Umeda · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 420910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00038-9 ↗
16. Kofler · Z Metallkd · 1950 · 41 · 221
17. Tassa · J Cryst Growth · 1976 · 34 · 3810.1016/0022-0248(76)90260-8 ↗
18. Jones · Trans Met AIME · 1980 · 11A · 126510.1007/BF02653480 ↗
19. Holder · Met Trans AIME · 1974 · 5 · 242310.1007/BF02644026 ↗
20. Mccartney · Metall Trans · 1980 · 11A · 125110.1007/BF02653478 ↗
21. Kurz · 1998
22. Mccartney · Metall Trans · 1980 · 11A · 124310.1007/BF02653477 ↗
23. Himemiya · Mater Trans JIM · 1999 · 40 · 66510.2320/matertrans1989.40.665 ↗
24. Debenedetti · Nature · 2001 · 410 · 25910.1038/35065704 ↗
25. Xu · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 92 · 24550410.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245504 ↗
26. Chen · Rep Prog Phys · 1980 · 43 · 35310.1088/0034-4885/43/4/001 ↗
27. Prince · 1966
28. Srivastava · Mater Trans · 2002 · 43 · 167010.2320/matertrans.43.1670 ↗