Thermal buckling analysis of sandwich plates with soft core and CNT-Reinforced composite face sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Previous studies on the thermal buckling of sandwich plates with composite face sheets indicate that only thin skins with high stiffness and low coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) can lead to the desired buckling temperatures. Thus, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) that can significantly enhance thermo-mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites are used in the present study to increase the critical buckling temperature of sandwich plates with soft core and laminated composite face sheets. First, a comprehensive series of experimental tests are conducted to evaluate the effects of nanotubes on thermo-mechanical properties of the face sheets. The experimental results indicate that using only 0.3% CNTs considerably increases the longitudinal and transverse Young’s modulus and shear modulus of the carbon fibre/epoxy composite face sheets. The obtained data also show that CNTs significantly decrease the CTE of composite skins. Subsequently, thermal buckling equations of sandwich plates with CNT-reinforced composite face sheets are derived based on piecewise low-order shear deformation theory (PLSDT). Three analytical, semi analytical, and numerical methods are used to investigate thermal buckling behaviour of the sandwich plates with various boundary conditions. To verify the results, several comparisons are performed, which show that the implemented methods can predict the buckling temperatures of sandwich plates with high accuracy. Finally, a parametric study is conducted to examine the effects of CNTs on the thermal buckling of sandwich plates for different length to thickness ratios, thicknesses of face sheets, stacking sequences of layers, and various types of boundary conditions. The results indicate that CNTs can increase the critical buckling temperature of sandwich plates by 22%–36%, based on the layup, geometrical parameters, and boundary conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon, South Korea
Department of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.007 ↗
3. Watanabe N Teranishi K. Stiffness and buckling analysis for sandwich plates with thermal buckling CFRP sheets – qualitative approach. In: 35th structures structural dynamics and materials conference 1994 p. 1575. USA: Hilton Head.10.2514/6.1994-1575 ↗
4. Watanabe N Hiroyuki Sato Yasushi Hishi N Watanabe Hiroyuki Sato et al. Thermal buckling behavior in Al honeycomb sandwich plates with very thin CFRP faces. In: 38th structures structural dynamics and materials conference p. 1249. 1997.10.2514/6.1997-1249 ↗
5. Ko WL. Predictions of thermal buckling strengths of hypersonic aircraft sandwich panels using minimum potential energy and finite element methods. 1995. Report Number: NASA-TM-4643 NAS 1.15:4643 H-2009 NIPS-95-06451 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19960008475.
6. 10.1080/01495730028048910.1080/014957300280489 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00127-010.1016/S0263-8223(99)00127-0 ↗
8. 10.1081/SME-12002659010.1081/SME-120026590 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.012 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.08310.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.083 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.051 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.021 ↗
15. 10.1177/109963621878316810.1177/1099636218783168 ↗
16. Zhai Y Su J Liang S. Free vibration and buckling analysis of composite sandwich plates in thermal environment. J Sandw Struct Mater. Epub ahead of print 28 October 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1099636218795375.10.1177/1099636218795375 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20030516210.1002/adfm.200305162 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.05.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.05.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.08710.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.087 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10711910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107119 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.014 ↗
24. Kamarian S Bodaghi M Isfahani RB et al. Influence of carbon nanotubes on thermal expansion coefficient and thermal buckling of polymer composite plates: experimental and numerical investigations. Mech Based Design Struct Mach. Epub ahead of print 17 October 2019. DOI: 10.1080/15397734.2019.1674664.10.1080/15397734.2019.1674664 ↗
25. 10.1142/S021945541750100010.1142/S0219455417501000 ↗
26. Ebrahimi F, Farazmandnia N. Thermal buckling analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite sandwich beams. Steel Compos Struct 2018; 27: 149–159.
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.002 ↗
28. 10.15625/0866-7136/1367310.15625/0866-7136/13673 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.05.00810.1016/j.tws.2013.05.008 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.04.01610.1016/j.tws.2014.04.016 ↗
31. Hyer MW White SR. Stress analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials. Lancaster: DEStech Publications Inc. 2009.
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.007 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00419-017-1326-x10.1007/s00419-017-1326-x ↗
34. 10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
35. 10.1002/fld.165015070410.1002/fld.1650150704 ↗
36. 10.1115/1.402885910.1115/1.4028859 ↗