Role of atomic variability and mechanical constraints on the martensitic phase transformation of a model disordered shape memory alloy via molecular dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We use molecular dynamics (MD) with an embedded atom model potential parameterized for NiAl to study martensitic phase transformations in a disordered shape memory alloy. We focus on the role of intrinsic atomic-level variability and mechanical constraints on the martensite and austenite transformation temperatures and on the martensite microstructure for specimens with varying size. We find that periodic system size has a weak effect on transformation temperature all the way to the nanometer scale, with the entropy-stabilized austenite phase slightly penalized with decreasing size. Atomic-level variability in these random alloys leads to significant sample-to-sample variability in transformation temperature. The uncertainty in the austenite transformation temperature increases with decreasing size, reaching ∼10% of the mean value for samples 10 nm on the side. Interestingly, the variability of the high-temperature martensite transition shows little size dependence. We find that a critical size of ∼40 nm is required to develop multidomain martensite microstructures, and mechanical constraints reduce this critical size to ∼7 nm, while significantly affecting the transformation temperatures. These results contribute to the understanding of martensitic transformation in nanocrystalline samples and of the fundamental limits of miniaturization of these alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhattacharya · Science · 2005 · 307 · 5310.1126/science.1100892 ↗
2. Daly · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 359310.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.011 ↗
3. Elliott · J Mech Phys Solids · 2011 · 59 · 21610.1016/j.jmps.2010.10.011 ↗
4. Kainuma · MRS Proc · 1994 · 360 · 46710.1557/PROC-360-467 ↗
5. Noda · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 42 · 39710.1103/PhysRevB.42.10397 ↗
6. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
7. Bhattacharya · 1964
8. Kim · Exp Mech · 2010 · 51 · 64110.1007/s11340-010-9435-2 ↗
9. Kimiecik · Adv Mater Process · 2013 · 21 · 21
10. Kim · Smart Mater Struct · 2013 · 22 · 07501210.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075012 ↗
11. Glezer · J Nanopart Res · 2003 · 5 · 55110.1023/B:NANO.0000006094.08917.46 ↗
12. Waitz · J Mech Phys Solids · 2007 · 55 · 41910.1016/j.jmps.2006.06.006 ↗
13. Phillips · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 187110.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.053 ↗
14. Benafan · J Appl Phys · 2012 · 112 · 09351010.1063/1.4764313 ↗
15. Kato · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 395510.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.021 ↗
16. Parrinello · J Appl Phys · 1981 · 52 · 718210.1063/1.328693 ↗
17. Meyer · Comput Mater Sci · 1998 · 10 · 1010.1016/S0927-0256(97)00083-9 ↗
18. Shao · Metall Mater Trans A · 1996 · 27 · 147710.1007/BF02649808 ↗
19. Ackland · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 1110.1016/j.msea.2006.12.237 ↗
20. Thompson · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 08542910.1103/PhysRevB.81.085429 ↗
21. Sandoval · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 229010.1021/nl9004767 ↗
22. Kastner · J Mech Phys Solids · 2009 · 57 · 10910.1016/j.jmps.2008.09.016 ↗
23. Kastner · J Mech Phys Solids · 2011 · 59 · 188810.1016/j.jmps.2011.05.009 ↗
24. Song · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 118910.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.028 ↗
25. Song · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 432810.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.023 ↗
26. Zhong · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 630110.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.004 ↗
27. Zhong · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 88310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.08.014 ↗
28. Wang · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 597910.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.045 ↗
29. Celik · Mol Simul · 2011 · 37 · 42110.1080/08927022.2010.547856 ↗
30. Ni · J Alloys Compd · 2012 · 546 · 110.1016/j.jallcom.2012.08.006 ↗
31. Saitoh · Comput Mater Sci · 2009 · 46 · 53110.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.025 ↗
32. Kazanc · Mol Simul · 2008 · 34 · 25110.1080/08927020701742323 ↗
33. Zelazny · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 144113 · 1
34. Zhang · J Phys Chem C · 2013 · 117 · 789510.1021/jp401670r ↗
35. Pun · J Phys Condens Matter · 2010 · 22 · 39540310.1088/0953-8984/22/39/395403 ↗
36. Guda Vishnu · Phys Rev B · 2012 · 85 · 01411410.1103/PhysRevB.85.014114 ↗
37. Farkas · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1995 · 3 · 20110.1088/0965-0393/3/2/005 ↗
38. Guda Vishnu · J Appl Phys · 2013 · 113 · 10350310.1063/1.4794819 ↗
39. Lazarev · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 100 · 06352010.1063/1.2352811 ↗
40. Lazarev · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 20510.1016/j.msea.2007.05.105 ↗
41. Zhang · Phys Rev Lett · 2013 · 111 · 14570110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.145701 ↗