journal article·2002-01

Engineering Method for Prediction of Impact Response and Damage in Sandwich Panels

Robin Olsson

Publisher page

Abstract

An engineering method is suggested for prediction of impact response and damage of flat sandwich panels. The approach accounts for local core crushing, delamination and large face sheet deflections and does not rely on empirical indentation laws. Different models are suggested depending upon the impactor mass being either larger or significantly smaller than the mass of the impacted panel. The solution for large mass impact is based on closed form expressions. The solution for small mass impact is obtained from a dimensionless two-parameter integral equation. The validity of the approach is demonstrated on a number of static indentation experiments and impacts on sandwich panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Processing · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Swedish Defence Research Agency, Aeronautics Division, FFA, SE-172 90 Stockholm, Sweden

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.311950010.1115/1.3119500 ↗
2. 10.1017/CBO978051157450410.1017/CBO9780511574504 ↗
3. 10.1115/1.310168910.1115/1.3101689 ↗
4. Olsson, R. · 1998
5. Nilsson, S. · 1999
6. McGowan, D. M. · 713
7. 7. Lie, S. C., 1989. “ Damage resistance and damage tolerance of thin composite facesheet honey-comb panels ,” S.M. Thesis, Dept. of Aero. and Astro., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
8. Williamson, J. E. · 287
9. Rinaird, O. · 1995
10. 10. Tsang, P. H. W. 1989. “ Impact resistance of graphite/epoxy sandwich panels ,” S.M. Thesis, Dept. of Aero. and Astro., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
11. Mines, R. A. W. · 149
12. Sun, C. T. · 1123
13. 10.1177/00219983930270130110.1177/002199839302701301 ↗
14. 10.2516/ogst:199500810.2516/ogst:1995008 ↗
15. 15. Abdul Wahab, M. A., 1997. “Etude du compertement dynamique de panneaux sandwichs a l’impact,” PhD Thesis 97.02, Ecole Nationale Superieure d’Arts et Metiers, Bordeaux.
16. Ambur, D. R. · 2681
17. 10.1177/00219983920260040310.1177/002199839202600403 ↗
18. Davies, P. · 1995 · 341
19. 10.1177/10996362000020020310.1177/109963620000200203 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0094508610.1007/BF00945086 ↗
21. Olsson, R. · 231
22. 10.2514/3.1321810.2514/3.13218 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00051-110.1016/S1359-8368(98)00051-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00136-110.1016/S0263-8223(99)00136-1 ↗
25. Whitney, J. M. · 1987
26. Zenkert, D. · 1995
27. 27. Olsson, R. 1994. “ Simplified theory for contact indentation of sandwich panels ,” SM Thesis, Aero. and Astro. Dept., MIT (also FFA TN 1994-33, FFA, Sweden).10.2514/6.1995-1374 ↗
28. 28. Vesic, A. S. 1973. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, 4. 2:51-52.
29. Selvadurai, A. P. S. · 1979
30. Olsson, R. · Composites Part A · 2000
31. 10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L ↗
32. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00020-810.1016/S1359-835X(00)00020-8 ↗
33. 33. Frischbier J. 1987. “Theorie der Stossbelastung orthotroper Platten und ihre experimentelle Überprüfung,” Mitteilung 51 , Bochum: Inst. für Mechanik, Ruhr-Univ.
34. 10.2514/3.1110510.2514/3.11105 ↗
35. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90055-210.1016/0020-7683(87)90055-2 ↗
36. 10.1017/S030500410002233710.1017/S0305004100022337 ↗
37. 37. Timoshenko, S. P. 1913. “Zur Frage nach den Wirkung eines Stoßes auf eninen Balken,” Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik , 62:198-209.
38. 10.1115/1.316912010.1115/1.3169120 ↗
39. Timoshenko, S. P. · 1959
40. Lekhnitskii, S. G. · 1968
41. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.120-121.58310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.120-121.583 ↗
42. Davies, P. · 1994 · 513