journal article·2011-10

Transient solute drag in migrating grain boundaries

J. Svoboda, F.D. Fischer, M. Leindl

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the solute drag in migrating grain boundaries or interfaces has been a topic in materials research since Cahn’s seminal paper in 1962. However, mostly steady-state solutions for solute segregation and drag in a migrating interface have been investigated. Here a new concept, based on the thermodynamic extremal principle, is introduced, which allows a detailed study of the transient processes in the migrating interface starting from a given initial configuration. The system is then described by two parameters, the first representing the amount of segregated solute in the grain boundary and the second the grain boundary position. Stability studies are performed using the perturbation concept. The model is demonstrated by simulations for a Fe–0.1 at.% Ni alloy taking different values for the grain boundary mobility and the driving force.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 96710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00396-2 ↗
2. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 74610.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.021 ↗
3. Cahn · Acta Metall · 1962 · 10 · 78910.1016/0001-6160(62)90092-5 ↗
4. Cahn · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 439710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00074-8 ↗
5. Lücke · Acta Metall · 1971 · 19 · 108710.1016/0001-6160(71)90041-1 ↗
6. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1976 · 24 · 73110.1016/0001-6160(76)90108-5 ↗
7. Li · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 71610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.041 ↗
8. Bréchet · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 558710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00422-1 ↗
9. Korzhenevskii · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 159510.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.023 ↗
10. Okamoto · Int J Mater Res · 2010 · 101 · 123210.3139/146.110413 ↗
11. Mendelev · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 284310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00175-6 ↗
12. Mendelev MI, Srolovitz DJ, E W. Philos Mag A 2001; 81: 2243.10.1080/01418610108217146 ↗
13. Mendelev · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2002 · 10 · R7910.1088/0965-0393/10/6/201 ↗
14. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 111710.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.049 ↗
15. Ma · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 368710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00184-8 ↗
16. Cha · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 381710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00187-8 ↗
17. Strandlund · Comput Mater Sci · 2008 · 44 · 26510.1016/j.commatsci.2008.03.030 ↗
18. Kim · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 373910.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.007 ↗
19. Li · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 210810.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.003 ↗
20. Gamsjäger · Philos Mag Lett · 2008 · 88 · 41510.1080/09500830802132510 ↗
21. Fratzl · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 19570210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195702 ↗
22. Trelewicz · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 09411210.1103/PhysRevB.79.094112 ↗
23. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 304310.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.041 ↗
24. Svoboda · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 369910.1080/14786430500267760 ↗
25. Lee · Z Metallkd · 1996 · 87 · 195
26. Fridberg · Jernkont Ann · 1969 · 153 · 263
27. Krielaart · Mater Sci Eng · 1997 · A237 · 21610.1016/S0921-5093(97)00365-1 ↗