Simulation study on curing deformation of hybrid fiber-reinforced composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid fiber-reinforced composites (HFRCs) are increasingly applied in structural components; however, controlling cure-induced deformation constitutes a challenge for ensuring the dimensional accuracy of the final products. To address this, the present study investigates a hybrid composite system composed of carbon (T300/J284PD) and quartz (QW100/J284PD) fiber prepregs. A coupled thermo-chemo-mechanical finite element model was established to analyze the influence of key design parameters—specifically ply angle, laminate thickness, and stacking sequence—on deformation behaviors. Experimental validation indicates that the proposed model shows good agreement with the measured data. The analysis suggests that stacking symmetry is a primary factor influencing deformation; transitioning from an asymmetric to a fully symmetric configuration reduced the deformation magnitude by over 95% in the studied cases. Additionally, cure-induced deformation showed a monotonic trend with varying ply angles, while increased laminate thickness contributed to mitigating warpage by enhancing overall flexural stiffness. These findings offer theoretical insights and an effective predictive method for the layup design and process optimization of HFRCs, providing useful guidance for the precision manufacturing of composite structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kunming, University of Science and Technology
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
The 10th Research Institute of China Electronic Technology Group Corporation
Funding
Key Program for Basic Research
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12221-010-0455-410.1007/s12221-010-0455-4 ↗
2. 10.1007/s13399-022-03458-110.1007/s13399-022-03458-1 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10965-024-03946-010.1007/s10965-024-03946-0 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853-010-5134-810.1007/s10853-010-5134-8 ↗
5. 10.1080/15440478.2019.159891610.1080/15440478.2019.1598916 ↗
6. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.1510.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.15 ↗
7. 10.1080/03602559.2015.109869410.1080/03602559.2015.1098694 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12633-018-0009-810.1007/s12633-018-0009-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.020 ↗
10. 10.1515/rams-2021-007210.1515/rams-2021-0072 ↗
11. 10.1088/2053-1591/abc21c10.1088/2053-1591/abc21c ↗
12. 10.1080/15440478.2022.215696410.1080/15440478.2022.2156964 ↗
13. 10.1177/0021998324124612810.1177/00219983241246128 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.10999710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.109997 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12221-017-7682-x10.1007/s12221-017-7682-x ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.10137710.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101377 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10973-025-14976-110.1007/s10973-025-14976-1 ↗
18. Mujabar F, Mujabar S. Investigation of mode II delamination resistance of E-Glass and S-Glass hybrid fiber composites using end-notched flexure specimen Test. Fibers Polym 2025; 27: 1–13, (prepublish). https://doi.org/10.1007/S12221-025-01229-Z
19. 10.1007/s12221-025-01110-z10.1007/s12221-025-01110-z ↗
20. 10.1016/B978-0-443-13623-8.00021-610.1016/B978-0-443-13623-8.00021-6 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1313217010.3390/polym13132170 ↗
22. 10.1016/B978-0-12-820559-4.00001-810.1016/B978-0-12-820559-4.00001-8 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10924-021-02169-410.1007/s10924-021-02169-4 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1421663110.3390/ma14216631 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1405112410.3390/ma14051124 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.10510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.105 ↗
27. 10.1177/073168441245193710.1177/0731684412451937 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.018 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.75012010410.1002/pc.750120104 ↗
30. 10.1080/1075941980894589710.1080/10759419808945897 ↗
31. 10.1177/00219983830170020410.1177/002199838301700204 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10443-017-9633-510.1007/s10443-017-9633-5 ↗
33. 10.1177/00219983920260050210.1177/002199839202600502 ↗
34. 10.1177/00219983830170050610.1177/002199838301700506 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00059-410.1016/S0032-3861(03)00059-4 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.1993.07049021210.1002/app.1993.070490212 ↗
37. 10.1002/pen.1119110.1002/pen.11191 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.001 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10999-012-9205-710.1007/s10999-012-9205-7 ↗
40. 10.1177/a03732310.1177/a037323 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.032 ↗
42. 10.1177/073168440934070710.1177/0731684409340707 ↗
43. 10.1177/07316844000190080210.1177/073168440001900802 ↗
44. 10.1177/002199830203602178410.1177/0021998302036021784 ↗
45. Stango RJ, Wang SS. Process-induced residual thermal stresses in advanced fiber-reinforced composite laminates. J Manuf Sci Eng 1984; 106: 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3185910
46. 10.1177/002199830505351110.1177/0021998305053511 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.017 ↗
48. 10.1177/00219983760100040110.1177/002199837601000401 ↗
49. 10.1002/app.2433710.1002/app.24337 ↗
50. 10.1007/BF0191141110.1007/BF01911411 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.tca.2011.07.01410.1016/j.tca.2011.07.014 ↗
52. 10.1002/1097-4628(20000815)77:7<1419::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/1097-4628(20000815)77:7<1419::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
53. 10.1109/TCAPT.2004.82857910.1109/TCAPT.2004.828579 ↗
54. 10.1177/00219983680020030810.1177/002199836800200308 ↗