journal article·2026-03-17

Design and analysis of simulated ice for a civil aircraft airfoil

Xiang Li, Guohui Chang, Deng’an Cai, Guangming Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

Natural icing flight tests are costly and risky, necessitating reliable simulated ice models for airworthiness certification. This study presents a novel approach utilizing a 3D-printed sandwich composite (UV-curable resin core with GFRP skins) to replicate critical ice shapes for dry air flight testing. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations quantified the aerodynamic degradation, revealing that leading-edge ice accretion reduces the maximum lift coefficient by 24.1% at 0.4 Ma and advances the stall angle by 2° due to premature flow separation. A finite element model incorporating cohesive zone elements and the Tsai–Wu failure criterion was developed to assess the structural integrity of the simulated ice. The results indicate that the simulated ice exhibits negligible deformation (less than 0.2% of the chord length) while maintaining sufficient safety margins under aerodynamic loading, which is accurately mapped to structural nodes using the inverse-distance weighting interpolation method. This study provides a feasible implementation scheme for dry air flight test with simulated ice, offering high safety reliability while fully complying with airworthiness requirements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Funding

Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions · Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Technology Innovation Special Fund of Jiangsu Province

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.11999710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119997 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.10210610.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102106 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.02810.1016/j.ast.2017.12.028 ↗
4. Raj LP, Yee K, Myong RS. Sensitivity of ice accretion and aerodynamic performance degradation to critical physical and modeling parameters affecting airfoil icing. Aero Sci Technol 2020; 98: 205659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105659
5. 10.2514/6.2006-8210.2514/6.2006-82 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.10377510.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103775 ↗
7. 10.1088/1742-6596/2784/1/01201610.1088/1742-6596/2784/1/012016 ↗
8. 10.2514/6.1992-64710.2514/6.1992-647 ↗
9. 10.3390/coatings1505060610.3390/coatings15050606 ↗
10. 10.2514/6.2004-73410.2514/6.2004-734 ↗
11. Wright W. User’s manual for LEWICE version 3.2. NASA/CR-2008-214255. 2008.
12. 10.2514/3.1279510.2514/3.12795 ↗
13. 10.2514/6.2002-38510.2514/6.2002-385 ↗
14. 10.2514/2.311310.2514/2.3113 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ast.2011.08.00410.1016/j.ast.2011.08.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ast.2024.10931510.1016/j.ast.2024.109315 ↗
17. 10.2514/1.3455010.2514/1.34550 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.01010.1016/j.ast.2019.05.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ast.2025.11020210.1016/j.ast.2025.110202 ↗
20. 10.1063/5.010199110.1063/5.0101991 ↗
21. 10.1177/0036850425140449110.1177/00368504251404491 ↗
22. 10.2514/6.2007-8910.2514/6.2007-89 ↗
23. 10.2514/6.2004-73610.2514/6.2004-736 ↗
24. 10.4271/2019-01-198810.4271/2019-01-1988 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.10412110.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104121 ↗
26. 10.2514/1.C03742110.2514/1.C037421 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.04.00110.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.04.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-210.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.054 ↗
30. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
31. 10.1177/07316844840030010210.1177/073168448400300102 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0898-1221(98)00101-110.1016/S0898-1221(98)00101-1 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10443-022-10078-510.1007/s10443-022-10078-5 ↗