journal article·2026-05

Baseline-free defect detection in CFRP laminates via tri-planar blind-spot U-Nets and ultrasonic wavefields

Shain Azadi, Robert Gervasio, Yoji Okabe, Valter Carvelli

Publisher page

Abstract

This study presents a baseline-free, self-supervised framework for defect detection in carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates using laser ultrasonic guided wave (LUGW) wavefield data. The experimental investigation involves two quasi-isotropic eight-ply laminates with a [0/45/90/−45] S stacking sequence, each containing an artificial defect made by a centrally embedded square PTFE insert (10×10 mm 2 and 5×5 mm 2 ) at the mid-plane to simulate local delamination. Data preprocessing includes narrowband temporal filtering centered on the dominant carrier frequency and frame-wise spatial detrending, followed by tri-planar decomposition of the spatiotemporal wavefield volume. Each orthogonal plane is processed independently using attention-assisted blind-spot U-Nets trained through masked-pixel restoration, producing per-pixel posterior means and log-variances. The three probabilistic estimates are fused using a product-of-experts (PoE) model, yielding a unified prediction with calibrated uncertainty. A standardized residual between the observed data and the fused prediction is used to drive adaptive thresholding and morphological post-processing, resulting in coherent delamination masks. The uncertainty-aware fusion strategy effectively down-weights low-information regions and mitigates boundary artifacts. A dual decision criterion based on the area fraction and the mean anomaly score enables robust detection. The proposed pipeline achieves accurate and interpretable delamination localization without reliance on prior knowledge of structural properties, defect presence, baseline measurements, or labeled training data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Politecnico di Milano

The University of Tokyo

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804459-9.00002-610.1016/B978-0-12-804459-9.00002-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-85709-523-7.00005-010.1016/B978-0-85709-523-7.00005-0 ↗
3. 10.1016/0263-8231(88)90018-310.1016/0263-8231(88)90018-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11506310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115063 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.402764710.1115/1.4027647 ↗
6. 10.1533/9781845694821.1.310.1533/9781845694821.1.3 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-1-84882-784-410.1007/978-1-84882-784-4 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05300110.1088/0964-1726/25/5/053001 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/26/3/00110.1088/0022-3727/26/3/001 ↗
10. 10.1088/0957-0233/18/12/01710.1088/0957-0233/18/12/017 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10492710.1016/j.rinp.2021.104927 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10714010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107140 ↗
13. 10.1177/147592171775004710.1177/1475921717750047 ↗
14. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. MIT Press, 2016.
15. 10.3389/fbuil.2020.0014610.3389/fbuil.2020.00146 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11090810.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110908 ↗
17. 10.3390/s2306329010.3390/s23063290 ↗
18. 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.299239310.1109/TPAMI.2020.2992393 ↗
19. Jenni S Favaro P. Self-supervised feature learning by learning to spot artifacts. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Salt Lake City UT USA 18–23 June 2018 pp. 2733–2742. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.0028910.1109/CVPR.2018.00289 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10583710.1016/j.engappai.2023.105837 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_2810.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
22. Jiangtao W, Ruhaiyem NIR, Panpan F. A comprehensive review of U‐Net and its variants: advances and applications in medical image segmentation. IET Image Process, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.70019. Epub ahead of print.
23. 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.343557110.1109/TPAMI.2024.3435571 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-023-32318-910.1038/s41598-023-32318-9 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1623725410.3390/ma16237254 ↗
26. 10.1080/10589759.2020.175809910.1080/10589759.2020.1758099 ↗
27. 10.1080/17686733.2024.238740610.1080/17686733.2024.2387406 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10292610.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102926 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tmater.2023.10001410.1016/j.tmater.2023.100014 ↗
30. 10.3390/coatings1205063410.3390/coatings12050634 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021998324129277910.1177/00219983241292779 ↗
32. 10.3390/s2514429210.3390/s25144292 ↗
33. 10.1121/10.000482710.1121/10.0004827 ↗
34. Toray Industries Inc. Toray T700SC/2500 technical data sheet. https://www.cf-composites.toray/resources/data_sheets/pdf/datasheets_2500.pdf (accessed 30 October 2023).
35. 10.1299/jmmp.1.140510.1299/jmmp.1.1405 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10716310.1016/j.ultras.2023.107163 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10656010.1016/j.ultras.2021.106560 ↗
38. 10.1201/978020374909810.1201/9780203749098 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.006 ↗
40. Oktay O, Schlemper J, Le Folgoc L, et al. Attention U-Net: learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv, 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.03999
41. He K Zhang X Ren S et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Las Vegas NV USA 27–30 June 2016 pp. 770–778. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
42. Kendall A Gal Y. What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NeurIPS 2017) (eds Guyon I von Luxburg U Bengio S et al.) Long Beach CA USA 4–9 December 2017 pp. 5574–5584. Curran Associates. https://doi.org/10.5555/3295222.3295309
43. 10.1162/08997660276012801810.1162/089976602760128018 ↗