Coupling mechanism and process optimization of pore-mechanical properties in hot-press forming of CCF/PEKK laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
In view of the high strength and high reliability requirements of composite pallet covers for load-bearing drones, this study focuses on the quantitative coupling relationship between process parameters–porosity–mechanical properties in CCF/PEKK hot-pressing forming. The Box–Behnken response surface method was used to establish the regression model of forming temperature, pressure and holding time on flexural strength, interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), and porosity ( R 2 > 0.98). Results show that: for every 1% increase in porosity, the flexural strength decreases by about 83 MPa, and the ILSS decreases by about 3.4 MPa; the flexural strength and ILSS have a strong positive correlation ( r = 0.967), indicating that both are strongly correlated with porosity; the flexural strength exhibits a stronger correlation with porosity compared with ILSS, as bending stress tends to concentrate around pores while shear stress can be redistributed. The temperature × pressure interaction shows significant synergy on pore control ( p = 0.0008). SEM confirmed that low-porosity samples showed matrix ductile fracture characteristics, while high-porosity samples showed interface debonding. Optimal process via multi-objective optimization: 370.14°C, 8.12 MPa, 21.97 min, with verification error < 5%. This suggests a quantitative “process–pore–performance” relationship, providing a useful reference and preliminary process window.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shandong University of Technology
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2876410.1002/pc.28764 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1517365310.3390/polym15173653 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11252910.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112529 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10912710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109127 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20220075010.1002/adma.202200750 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1514495010.3390/ma15144950 ↗
7. 10.1177/0892705721105177310.1177/08927057211051773 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10443-021-09916-910.1007/s10443-021-09916-9 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2668710.1002/pc.26687 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1503060710.3390/polym15030607 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12206-024-0515-010.1007/s12206-024-0515-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13724110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137241 ↗
13. 10.1177/095400832090376810.1177/0954008320903768 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1101005310.3390/polym11010053 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2690010.1002/pc.26900 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.03510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.035 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.11000810.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.110008 ↗
19. 10.1177/0731684423115913410.1177/07316844231159134 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.10445610.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104456 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1618617410.3390/ma16186174 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10711010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107110 ↗
24. 10.1177/0892705723115853210.1177/08927057231158532 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11407610.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114076 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12221-022-4658-210.1007/s12221-022-4658-2 ↗
27. 10.1177/0731684422113048710.1177/07316844221130487 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12457310.1016/j.polymer.2022.124573 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10791710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107917 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10781710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107817 ↗
31. ASTM D7264/D7264M-15. Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7264_D7264M-15
32. ASTM D2344/D2344M-16. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2344_D2344M-16
33. 10.1177/0731684422114083310.1177/07316844221140833 ↗
34. 10.1177/0731684423121931410.1177/07316844231219314 ↗
35. 10.1177/0731684425136602410.1177/07316844251366024 ↗
36. 10.1080/00031305.2023.218695210.1080/00031305.2023.2186952 ↗
37. 10.1177/07316844920110120310.1177/073168449201101203 ↗
38. 10.1177/0731684422114374710.1177/07316844221143747 ↗
39. 10.1177/0731684425140427410.1177/07316844251404274 ↗