Nanoclay influence on hygrothermal aging of corn husk–glass fiber hybrid composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the hygrothermal aging behavior of sustainable hybrid composites composed of corn husk, E-glass reinforcement, and epoxy matrix modified with organo-montmorillonite nanoclay (0–2 wt.%). Natural fibers reinforced hybrid composites were exposed to acidic, neutral, and seawater conditions for 60 days, to assess their environmental endurance. Natural fibers were incorporated in various forms included sheet, powder, and fibers. The research reveals the effect of incorporating nanoclay into the epoxy on hygrothermal aging of hybrid composites. Nanoclay additions into epoxy considerably reduced the moisture absorption percentage and decelerating mechanical properties deterioration rate. The sheet-based reinforced composites demonstrated greater long-term retention in aggressive conditions and fiber based composites offered higher initial strength. The study tackles important issues in the durability of natural fiber composites while advancing the value adding of agricultural waste. This work provides tensile properties decay models which offers practical guidance for designing sustainable composites for chemical, marine, and construction applications. In addition, this work provides open avenues for future research on machine learning models to predict durability performance under various environmental conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, IFET College of Engineering
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Pokharel A, Falua KJ, Babaei-Ghazvini A, et al. Biobased polymer composites: a review. Polymers 2022; 6(9): 255.
2. Andrew JJ, Dhakal HN. Sustainable biobased composites for advanced applications. Mater Today Sustain 2022; 20: 100256.
3. Elfaleh I, Abbassi F, Habibi M, et al. A comprehensive review of natural fibers and their composites. Composite Structures Reports 2023; 3: 100045.
4. Thapliyal D, Verma S, Sen P, et al. Natural fibers composites: origin, importance and recent advances. Polymers & Composites Reviews 2023; 7(12): 506.
5. 10.3390/polym1417369810.3390/polym14173698 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10897810.1016/j.triboint.2023.108978 ↗
7. Ekundayo G, Gong H, Abeykoon C, et al. Jute-fibre-reinforced polymer composites in structural applications: a review. J Mat Const 2024; 12(2): 145–168.
8. Pisupati A, Deleglise LM. Mechanical performance of flax fiber composites with waste glass: processing and properties. Mater Res Express. 2022; 9(6): 062001.
9. Prem Kumar R, Muthukrishnan M, Felix Sahayaraj A, et al. Effect of hybridization on natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: a critical review. Polym Compos 2023; 44(5): 2156–2178.
10. 10.1080/15440478.2023.220445310.1080/15440478.2023.2204453 ↗
11. 10.3390/polym1507171110.3390/polym15071711 ↗
12. Mohammadi M, Ishak MR, Sultan MTH, et al. Exploring chemical and physical advancements in natural fiber pretreatments for composites. J Nat Fibers 2024; 21(4): 789–812.
13. 10.1080/15440478.2018.143199510.1080/15440478.2018.1431995 ↗
14. 10.1155/2022/200969110.1155/2022/2009691 ↗
15. Jawaid M, Singh S, Saba N. Hybrid composites of natural and synthetic fibres: sustainable design and performance. Compos B Eng. 2022; 240: 110152.
16. Sarasini F, Fiore V. Recent advances in hybrid natural/synthetic fibre composites for structural applications. Compos Struct 2023; 303: 116279.
17. Hasan MM, Islam MA, Hassan T, et al. Analysis of jute–glass fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composite: mechanical and flexural performance. Mater Today Commun 2024; 39: 105298.
18. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2023.11021310.1016/j.jfluchem.2023.110213 ↗
19. Mahmud S, Konlan J, Deicaza J, et al. Coir/glass hybrid fiber reinforced thermoset polymer composite laminates for construction applications. Compos B Eng. 2023; 242: 110197.
20. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10011110.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100111 ↗
21. Dhakal HN Zhang ZY Richardson MOW. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67(7-8): 1674–1683.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019 ↗
22. 10.1007/s12221-020-9494-710.1007/s12221-020-9494-7 ↗
23. Yan L, Chouw N. Effect of water and alkaline environments on natural fibres and composites: durability challenges. Constr Build Mater 2022; 318: 125987.
24. 10.1515/epoly-2022-008010.1515/epoly-2022-0080 ↗
25. Uddin MN, Hossain MT, Mahmud N, et al. Research and applications of nanoclays: a review. Plast Rubber Compos 2024; 53(1): 1–25.
26. Ejeta LO. Nanoclay/organic-filler reinforced polymeric hybrid composites: state-of-the-art review. Compos Interfaces 2023; 30(2): 1–24.
27. 10.3390/min1306081710.3390/min13060817 ↗
28. 10.1080/23311916.2024.233816010.1080/23311916.2024.2338160 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1401021610.3390/polym14010216 ↗
30. 10.3390/jcs712048410.3390/jcs7120484 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1419395510.3390/polym14193955 ↗
32. 10.1080/15440478.2023.229691510.1080/15440478.2023.2296915 ↗
33. 10.1007/s43939-025-00304-910.1007/s43939-025-00304-9 ↗
34. Mallampati SC, Gujjala R, Manne AA, et al. A study on the effect of nanoclay addition on the erosion wear characteristics of S-glass/sisal reinforced hybrid polymer composites. Materials 2024; 4: 82.
35. 10.3390/polym1408162010.3390/polym14081620 ↗
36. 10.1177/228080002093018010.1177/2280800020930180 ↗
37. Yadav BK, Vandna, Gond DK, et al. Nano clay treated jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites: Thermo-kinetic, morphological and mechanical analysis. Polymer composites. Wiley, 2024, 45(11), pp. 10069–10083.
38. 10.1088/2053-1591/aba30a10.1088/2053-1591/aba30a ↗
39. 10.1088/1755-1315/573/1/01201310.1088/1755-1315/573/1/012013 ↗
40. 10.1177/0731684423120573410.1177/07316844231205734 ↗
41. 10.1007/s42824-024-00105-010.1007/s42824-024-00105-0 ↗