Impact-modified polyamide 11/carbon nanotubes 3D printing and potential enhancement of toughness in fiber reinforced polymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) of semi-crystalline polymers, such as polyamide 11 (PA11), is challenging due to significant shrinkage that occurs during cooling. This issue can be mitigated by blending the polymer with chemically compatible additives, which alter its rheological, thermal, and mechanical properties, thereby improving processability. In this study, we demonstrate the successful FFF printability of PA11 filaments modified with an ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (EAA-g-MAH) as an impact modifier. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were incorporated to compensate for the loss in terms of stiffness caused by the addition of EAA-g-MAH compound. Bulk compositions were prepared via melt compounding and compression molding and characterized, revealing that the addition of 20 wt% EAA-g-MAH increased the specific impact energy of PA11 by 282%. Two optimized impact-modified PA11 formulations—with and without CNTs—were subsequently extruded into filaments and, for the first time, successfully 3D printed through FFF. Mechanical testing demonstrated substantial improvements in ductility for the 3D-printed specimens, with increases of up to 56% for unfilled PA11 and 105% for CNT-reinforced PA11, relative to their bulk counterparts. This work opens new possibilities for directly printing tough polymers onto reinforcing fibers to create self-healing composites. Additionally, strong interfacial adhesion was achieved between glass fibers and the printed CNT-reinforced PA11, suggesting a potential increase in interlaminar toughness in fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs). These multifunctional materials processable via FFF represent a promising step toward the development of smart, self-healing structural composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Trento
Funding
European Union - Next Generation EU - PNRR
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.18110.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.181 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mser.2020.10059610.1016/j.mser.2020.100596 ↗
3. Kumar LJ, Krishnadas Nair CG. Current trends of additive manufacturing in the aerospace industry in advances in 3D printing & additive manufacturing technologies. Springer Singapore, 2017, pp. 39–54.
4. Vasco JC. Chapter 16 - additive manufacturing for the automotive industry in additive manufacturing. Elsevier, 2021, pp. 505–530.
5. 10.1016/j.eng.2020.02.01810.1016/j.eng.2020.02.018 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.11196510.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111965 ↗
7. Crump SS. Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. Patent 1992; 5: 121–329A.
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10833610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40964-024-00821-810.1007/s40964-024-00821-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.10836410.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108364 ↗
11. 10.3390/polym1514298010.3390/polym15142980 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.49010.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.490 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.10141110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101411 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1503071610.3390/polym15030716 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.01210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.012 ↗
16. 10.32604/jrm.2019.0013610.32604/jrm.2019.00136 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.11950110.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119501 ↗
18. 10.1177/009524431878195610.1177/0095244318781956 ↗
19. Tischer F, Cholewa S, Groppe P, et al. Magnetic polyamide 11 powder for the powder bed fusion process by liquid-liquid phase separation and crystallization. Addit Manuf 2024; 88: 104250.
20. 10.3390/polym1513296710.3390/polym15132967 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1501018310.3390/ma15010183 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.00810.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.008 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1212298010.3390/polym12122980 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.06510.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
25. 10.1177/09540083030150010110.1177/095400830301500101 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11255310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112553 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mser.2018.06.00210.1016/j.mser.2018.06.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.10.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.10.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11176710.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111767 ↗
31. 10.1016/0032-3861(89)90385-610.1016/0032-3861(89)90385-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.006 ↗
33. 10.1002/pat.341510.1002/pat.3415 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.1338410.1002/app.13384 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)10290-710.1016/S0032-3861(97)10290-7 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.027 ↗
37. Arash B, Wang Q, Varadan VK. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Nature Scien Rep 2014; 4(1): 6479.
38. 10.3390/polym1307104710.3390/polym13071047 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11173710.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111737 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12078610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120786 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10793910.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107939 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1507169610.3390/polym15071696 ↗
43. 10.3390/buildings1405131310.3390/buildings14051313 ↗
44. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10453210.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104532 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.012 ↗
46. 10.1002/pc.2762310.1002/pc.27623 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41467-022-33936-z10.1038/s41467-022-33936-z ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.08910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.089 ↗
49. 10.3390/ma1304081910.3390/ma13040819 ↗
50. 10.1002/pc.2298510.1002/pc.22985 ↗
51. 10.3390/polym1403039610.3390/polym14030396 ↗
52. ASTM D1876. Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test). ASTM International. 2008.
53. 10.1617/s11527-011-9778-x10.1617/s11527-011-9778-x ↗
54. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10224510.1016/j.rinp.2019.102245 ↗
55. 10.1002/app.3904610.1002/app.39046 ↗
56. 10.1007/s10853-006-1218-x10.1007/s10853-006-1218-x ↗
57. 10.3390/polym1703028010.3390/polym17030280 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0122810.1021/acsapm.0c01228 ↗
59. 10.3390/chemengineering701000110.3390/chemengineering7010001 ↗
60. 10.1007/s00397-021-01264-610.1007/s00397-021-01264-6 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.007 ↗
62. 10.3390/polym1320355310.3390/polym13203553 ↗
63. 10.1002/app.4264210.1002/app.42642 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15769110.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157691 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12590610.1016/j.polymer.2023.125906 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10837910.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108379 ↗
68. 10.1002/pen.2601610.1002/pen.26016 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10041310.1016/j.coco.2020.100413 ↗
70. ASTM D3330. Standard Test Method for Peel Adhesion of Pressure Sensitive Tape. ASTM International. 2018.
71. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0060210.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00602 ↗
72. 10.3390/polym1511251710.3390/polym15112517 ↗
73. 10.1177/073168441876122410.1177/0731684418761224 ↗