Modeling of progressive damage in metal-composite bolt joints: Insights into failure mechanisms
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate identification of the damage initiation location, propagation behavior, and damage modes of metal-composite joint structures is crucial for the design of civil aircraft. Considering the differences in the mechanical properties of metals and composites, a progressive damage model is developed based on a bilinear elastic-plastic hardening model and a three-dimensional (3D) Hashin damage model, which realizes the simultaneous analysis of the damage state of heterogeneous material joint structures. Experiments on seven typical multi-bolt metal-composite joints were conducted to investigate structural failure mechanisms. The results show that the geometric configuration and composite layup design are the dominant factors influencing the load-bearing capacity and failure modes. Optimizing the joint layout from a single-row to a double-row configuration increased the ultimate load by 57.8%. For the same configuration, optimizing the composite layup design improved stress redistribution between adjacent holes, enhancing the ultimate load by 19.5%. The improved finite element model demonstrated strong agreement with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, indicating that the competitive damage behavior between metal and composite components is the fundamental cause of diverse failure modes in the joints. The error is controlled within 5% compared with the experimental results, which verifies the accuracy of the model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Aviation University of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Central Universities-Key Projects in Natural Sciences
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11584610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115846 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1507243010.3390/ma15072430 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11312110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113121 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.007 ↗
5. ASTM D5691. Standard test method for open-hole tensile strength of polymer matrix composite laminates. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2011.
6. GB/T 7559-2005. Test method for bearing strength by bolted joints of fiber reinforced plastics laminate. 2005.
7. ASTM D7248-12. Standard test method for bearing/bypass interaction response of polymer matrix composite laminates using 2-Fastener specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2017.
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11122510.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111225 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.002 ↗
11. Mu WL, Na JX, Qin G, et al. Effects of alternating load on the residual strength of CFRP composite material-aluminum alloy adhesive joints. Acta Mater Compos Sin 2019; 36(05): 1124–1131.
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11216610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112166 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.03810.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.038 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.07210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.072 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10751510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107515 ↗
16. Cai QY, Zhao Q. Effects of temperature and clearance fit on the load distribution of composite-metal hybrid structures. Acta Mater Compos Sin 2021; 38(12): 4228–4238.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.05910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.059 ↗
18. Zhang JR, S MJ, Huang W, et al. Effects of hygrothermal environment on quasi-static failure of CFRP composite-aluminum alloy bolted joints. Acta Mater Compos Sin 2021; 38(07): 2224-2233.
19. Wang D, Dong CR, Zhu HM, et al. Effect of temperature on mechanical properties of metal-composite hybrid multi-bolt joint. Acta Mater Compos Sin 2024; 41(06): 3248–3257.
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11484110.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114841 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10717710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107177 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10790610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107906 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.10.01810.1016/j.rinp.2018.10.018 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10838510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108385 ↗
25. Structural repair Manual (SRM) for Airbus A320. Airbus, 2021.
26. Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook -Airframe. U.S. Department of Transportation federal Aviation administration, 2012, Vol 1 (FAA-H-8083-31).
27. ASTM 5766. Standard Test method for open-hole tensile strength of polymer matrix composite laminates. American Society for Testing and Materials.
28. GB/T 33582-2017. General standard for finite element mechanical analysis of mechanical product structures 2017.
29. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2010.06.01510.1016/j.tafmec.2010.06.015 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.10.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2007.10.002 ↗
31. 10.1177/00219983990330240210.1177/002199839903302402 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199831560294710.1177/0021998315602947 ↗
33. 10.1002/app.5675710.1002/app.56757 ↗
34. Rojas JI, Rojas JI. An experimental and numerical investigation on fatigue of composite and metal aircraft structures. Steel Compos Struct 2022.
35. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.10935510.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109355 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.5015910.1002/app.50159 ↗