journal article·2026-06

Efficient enhancement of impact strength of epoxy thermoset using Triton X-100

Siamak Zavareh, Zahra Mahtabi

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, Triton X-100, a commercially available non-ionic surfactant, was investigated as a novel toughening modifier for an epoxy-based thermoset. Incorporation of 8 phr Triton X-100 resulted in a remarkable 221% increase in impact strength compared to neat epoxy. SEM analysis revealed a nano-blend morphology with uniformly dispersed Triton X-100 nanoparticles (∼51 nm), while FTIR analysis confirmed interfacial chemical interactions between the modifier’s hydroxyl groups and the epoxy matrix. Mechanical testing showed that tensile strength and modulus decreased by 33% and 39%, respectively, while elongation at break increased by 191%, indicating enhanced ductility. Thermogravimetric analysis demonstrated that with increasing Triton X-100 content, the initiation degradation temperature (T ID ) decreased from 290°C to 219°C, whereas the maximum degradation temperature (T max ) increased significantly from 372°C to 417°C, reflecting improved thermal stability at elevated temperatures. Chemical resistance remained largely unchanged, except for a moderate reduction in stability against sulfuric acid. Overall, the findings highlight Triton X-100 as a promising and industrially viable toughening agent for epoxy thermosets, offering a favorable balance of mechanical and thermal performance for advanced structural applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Maragheh

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Research GV. Epoxy resin market size & trends. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/epoxy-resins-market
2. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.02610.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.026 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10097710.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100977 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10965-022-03195-z10.1007/s10965-022-03195-z ↗
5. 10.1002/app.5040710.1002/app.50407 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1416460110.3390/ma14164601 ↗
7. 10.26701/ems.86929310.26701/ems.869293 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199831558331710.1177/0021998315583317 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.3541710.1002/app.35417 ↗
10. 10.1080/00218464.2010.48241510.1080/00218464.2010.482415 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3275710.1002/app.32757 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7TC00437K10.1039/C7TC00437K ↗
13. 10.1002/pat.458010.1002/pat.4580 ↗
14. 10.1177/0967391122113012010.1177/09673911221130120 ↗
15. 10.1177/089270572093081010.1177/0892705720930810 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2661210.1002/pc.26612 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10281610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102816 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12221-021-9261-410.1007/s12221-021-9261-4 ↗
19. 10.1002/marc.20240054010.1002/marc.202400540 ↗
20. 10.1021/ie201101710.1021/ie2011017 ↗
21. 10.15282/ijame.18.3.2021.24.070110.15282/ijame.18.3.2021.24.0701 ↗
22. Abbas SS, Raouf RM, Al-Moameri H. A review of epoxy-nanocomposite properties. J Econ Sustain Dev 2024; 28: 75–94.
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.066 ↗
25. 10.1080/03602559.2015.107087410.1080/03602559.2015.1070874 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12172410.1016/j.polymer.2019.121724 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10835410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108354 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10088310.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100883 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.07.04010.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.07.040 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.08010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.080 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.17210.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.172 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.06810.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.068 ↗
33. 10.1002/app.5362410.1002/app.53624 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0031910.1021/acsapm.9b00319 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.coco.2023.10177110.1016/j.coco.2023.101771 ↗
36. Lu S, Ban J, Yu C, et al. Properties of epoxy resins modified with liquid crystalline polyurethane. Iranian Polymer Journal 2010; 19(9): 669–678.
37. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.05.00410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.05.004 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1411222810.3390/polym14112228 ↗
39. 10.1155/2021/998417410.1155/2021/9984174 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00289-015-1458-510.1007/s00289-015-1458-5 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00396-015-3665-x10.1007/s00396-015-3665-x ↗
42. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.10450510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104505 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.03.02210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.03.022 ↗
44. 10.1007/s42114-018-0027-410.1007/s42114-018-0027-4 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.03410.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.034 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.5455110.1002/app.54551 ↗
47. 10.1080/10601325.2020.173019010.1080/10601325.2020.1730190 ↗
48. 10.1515/polyeng-2014-039310.1515/polyeng-2014-0393 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12470310.1016/j.polymer.2022.124703 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.03510.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.035 ↗
51. Yao J, Shi P, Gao Y, et al. Evolution of phase structure and fracture toughness induced by carbon nanotubes in thermoplastic-toughened epoxy nanocomposites. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2023; 44: 07316844231209585.
52. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.01610.1016/j.msec.2019.02.016 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.14210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.142 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.06.02310.1016/j.electacta.2005.06.023 ↗
55. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab551710.1088/2053-1591/ab5517 ↗
56. 10.3390/ma1107114410.3390/ma11071144 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11337310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113373 ↗
58. 10.3390/jcs204007210.3390/jcs2040072 ↗