Role of stacking sequence, metal sheets, and nano particle on strength and toughness of FMLs
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of nano particle inclusion and the stacking sequence/metal volume fraction on the tensile strength and energy absorption properties of Fiber Metal Laminates (FML) is investigated. The FML structure is composed of lightweight thin sheets of aerospace grade aluminum alloy 7075 and unidirectional glass fiber composite sheets with Araldite LY5052 thermoset epoxy system as the matrix. The volume fraction of aluminum sheets in the FML structure was varied by increasing the number of aluminum sheets from 2 to maximum 4. In the second batch, the epoxy matrix is reinforced with of multi-walled carbon nano tubes and nano diamond particles together, each with 0.15 wt%. The purpose is to enhance the properties of the epoxy matrix to facilitate higher inter-laminate adhesion (FRP and aluminum). The results of the tensile testing show that with the increase of the metal volume fraction, the tensile strength as well energy absorbing capability (toughness) both are increased. The inclusion of the nano-reinforcements has increased the tensile strength and the toughness of the FML structure as compared to that of the FMLs without nano particles. The strength-to-weight ratio of FML structures is also increased after the inclusion of nano reinforced as desired for aerospace applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Synthesis and properties of polymers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)
NCP Complex
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11295110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112951 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.08710.1016/j.procir.2022.03.087 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170-022-10277-110.1007/s00170-022-10277-1 ↗
4. 10.1080/15376494.2021.199106110.1080/15376494.2021.1991061 ↗
5. 10.3897/arb.v34.e1510.3897/arb.v34.e15 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1515530310.3390/ma15155303 ↗
7. 10.1063/5.000124410.1063/5.0001244 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2647410.1002/pc.26474 ↗
9. Park SY, Choi WJ. The guidelines of material design and process control on hybrid fiber metal laminate for aircraft structures. Optimum composite structures 2019; 5: 70–92.
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10739010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107390 ↗
11. 10.1088/2053-1591/acb7cc10.1088/2053-1591/acb7cc ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1209208810.3390/polym12092088 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.08.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.08.008 ↗
14. 10.3390/nano711036010.3390/nano7110360 ↗
15. Roylance D. Stress-strain curves (Massachusetts institute of technology study). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
16. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab299410.1088/2053-1591/ab2994 ↗
17. 10.1177/073168442091599610.1177/0731684420915996 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.10010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.100 ↗
19. 10.1590/S1516-1439200600030000210.1590/S1516-14392006000300002 ↗
20. 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.119110.3934/matersci.2019.6.1191 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2610710.1002/pc.26107 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.05010.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.050 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11029-023-10072-310.1007/s11029-023-10072-3 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:102556931682710.1023/A:1025569316827 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10747810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107478 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-94-010-0995-910.1007/978-94-010-0995-9 ↗