journal article·2025-11

3D nonlinear finite element investigation of laminated bamboo plate strengthened prestressed concrete slab

Zhao Wang, Baolin Wan, Qingfeng Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

Due to environment and recycling concerns, interest in applying natural fiber reinforced polymer (NFRP) as an alternative for glass/carbon FRP to strengthen concrete structures has been increasing. This study developed a 3D nonlinear finite element (FE) model for laminated bamboo (LB) plate strengthened prestressed concrete slab. By involving temperature load on defined temperature sensitive material, the proposed model provided good simulation of prestressing process. The accuracy of the developed model was confirmed through comparisons with experimental data, representing peak load discrepancies of only 6.5% and 8.2% for un-strengthened and strengthened slabs, respectively. The parametric study examined the impact of LB plate dimensions and tensile strength, alongside the use of FRP wraps, on concrete slab performance. The results show that the 15 mm thick LB plate can enhance the slab’s peak load by 83.2%. Variations in LB plate tensile strength by up to 10% do not significantly affect the performance of the strengthened prestressed concrete. The increases of the peak load for strengthened cases with LB plate width of 150 mm, 300 mm and 460 mm were 29.4%, 41.9% and 50.2%, respectively. It also shows that FRP end wraps can increase the performance of thick LB plate strengthened prestressed concrete slab.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bamboo properties and applications · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Marquette University

Shanghai Research Institute of Building Sciences Co. Ltd

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Teng JG, Chen J, Smith ST, et al. FRP: strengthened RC structures. Hoboken: Wiley, 2002.
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.01510.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.015 ↗
3. 10.1533/978184569489010.1533/9781845694890 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.06.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2010.06.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.09610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.096 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000037510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000375 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11709-016-0339-910.1007/s11709-016-0339-9 ↗
8. Athijayamani A. Studies on the mechanical properties and machinability of rosellepolyester and rosellesisalpolyester hybrid composites 2010.
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.00810.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.033 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.077 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.10110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11278610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112786 ↗
15. 10.1186/s10086-020-1854-910.1186/s10086-020-1854-9 ↗
16. 10.1177/1099636221102352910.1177/10996362211023529 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.15910.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.159 ↗
18. 10.32604/jrm.2022.02262410.32604/jrm.2022.022624 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10107110.1016/j.jobe.2019.101071 ↗
20. 10.3390/ma1421671110.3390/ma14216711 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12553010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125530 ↗
22. 10.1617/s11527-020-01572-y10.1617/s11527-020-01572-y ↗
23. 10.1617/s11527-021-01616-x10.1617/s11527-021-01616-x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.039 ↗
25. Kachlakev DI Miller TH Potisuk T et al. Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete structures strengthened with FRP laminates 2001.
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(507)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(507) ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.030 ↗
28. Ibrahim AM, Mahmood MS. Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP laminates. Eur J Sci Res 2009; 173: 106952.
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.007 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.110 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.03110.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.031 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.02310.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.023 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000079710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000797 ↗
34. 10.3390/jcs609026310.3390/jcs6090263 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000127110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001271 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1422510.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14225 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0167010.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01670 ↗
38. 10.3390/jcs501001910.3390/jcs5010019 ↗
39. Desayi P, Krishnan S. Equation for the stress-strain curve of concrete. J. Proceed Anony 1964; 61: 345–350.
40. Hognestad E. Study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members 1951.
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(161)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(161) ↗
42. 10.1007/978-3-642-17487-2_710.1007/978-3-642-17487-2_7 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000022610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000226 ↗
44. Kaewunruen S Remennikov A. Nonlinear finite element modelling of railway prestressed concrete sleeper 2006.
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.016 ↗
46. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-376410.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3764 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:12(1467)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:12(1467) ↗
48. 10.1177/168781401558541910.1177/1687814015585419 ↗
49. 10.1177/073168441562308810.1177/0731684415623088 ↗