Seismic Retrofit of Concrete Block Wall Intersections Using Composite Laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of strengthening the intersection of flanged concrete block shear walls using surface-bonded composite laminates. A total of 15 specially designed flange-web intersecting wall specimens were tested using four different retrofit schemes. Tests included wall intersections reinforced with unidirectional laminate with the fibers oriented perpendicular to loading direction (90°), and bi-directional laminate with orientations of (90°/0°), (90°/0°) 2 , and (45°/135°) to the applied load direction. The behavior of each specimen type is discussed with respect to its failure mode, strength, and deformation characteristics. Results showed that the composite laminates significantly increased the shear strength of concrete block shear wall intersections. In addition, the fiber orientation influenced the failure mode and controlled the development of the post-peak deformation capacity of the flange-web intersection. The improved post-peak behavior demonstrated the benefits of retrofitting concrete block wall intersections for strength enhancement. The retrofit scheme resulted in 100%—400% increase in strength compared to non-retrofitted specimens constructed with traditional steel joint reinforcement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada
Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7, Canada,
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978047017284110.1002/9780470172841 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:1(17)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:1(17) ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:4(172)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:4(172) ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(76)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(76) ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(170)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(170) ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(139)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(139) ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(20)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(20) ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(79)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(79) ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.017 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(73) ↗
11. Drysdale, R.G. · Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE · 2008 · 134 · 947
12. El-Dakhakhni, W.W. · TMS Journal · 2004 · 13
13. Drysdale, R.G. and Hamid, A. (2008). Masonry Structures, Behavior and Design, 3rd edn, Masonry Society, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
14. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). · Annual Book of ASTM Standards · 2006 · 04
15. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). · 2004
16. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). · Annual Book of ASTM Standards · 2007 · 04
17. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). · Annual Book of ASTM Standards · 2005 · 04
18. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). · Annual Book of ASTM Standards · 2005 · 01
19. Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC). · American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., Masonry Society · 2005
20. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). · Canadian Standards Association · 2004
21. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). · Annual Book of ASTM Standards · 2006