Correction and control of lay-up force in automated fiber placement based on optimal pressure range
Source abstract
Abstract
Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) has become a key technique for manufacturing lightweight, high-strength carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) structures for aerospace applications. Precise control of process parameters, particularly lay-up force, is crucial for achieving high-quality placement and optimal mechanical properties. However, due to the complex interaction between the flexible roller and irregular mold surfaces, understanding pressure distribution during lay-up is challenging. This study develops a constitutive model for the roller and laminate and analyzes the roller-mold contact. Lay-up force is continuously adjusted to maintain the contact center pressure within the Optimal Pressure Range (OPR). To achieve real-time control, the roller cylinder’s dynamic characteristics were analyzed, and sliding mode control of the lay-up force was implemented by regulating input air pressure. Experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach, reducing pressure fluctuation residuals by 67.92%. The adjusted lay-up force maintained consistent pressure throughout the AFP process, significantly lowering defect risks compared to using a constant lay-up force.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Zhejiang Provincial Universities · Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-821090-1.00023-510.1016/B978-0-12-821090-1.00023-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10796810.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107968 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-031-38241-3_5910.1007/978-3-031-38241-3_59 ↗
4. Castillo DS Martin I Rodriguez-Lence F et al. On-line monitoring of a laser-Assisted fiber placement process with CFR thermoplastic matrix by using Fiber Bragg Gratings. In: 8th European workshop on structural health monitoring (EWSHM 2016) Bilbao Spain 5–8 July 2016 4 3009–3018.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.017 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11672510.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116725 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-010-3028-110.1007/s00170-010-3028-1 ↗
9. 10.1080/20550340.2020.176423610.1080/20550340.2020.1764236 ↗
10. 10.1177/002199831244181010.1177/0021998312441810 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168441986884510.1177/0731684419868845 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.014 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.07610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.076 ↗
15. Zacchia TT Shadmehri F Fortin-Simpson J et al. Design of hard compaction rollers for automated fiber placement on complex mandrel geometries. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering International Congress Toronto ON Canada 2018 pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.25071/10315/35245.10.25071/10315/35245 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10018210.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100182 ↗
17. Endruweit A Ghose S Johnson BA et al. Tack testing to aid optimisation of process parameters for automated material placement in an industrial environment. In: ICCM international conference on composite materials Xi'an China 20–25 August 2017 20–25.
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10770210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107702 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.22010.1016/j.procir.2017.03.220 ↗
22. Oromiehie E Prusty BG Compston P et al. The influence of consolidation force on the performance of AFP manufactured laminates. In: ICCM international conference on composite materials Xi'an China 20–25 August 2017.
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11422310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114223 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11377910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113779 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00170-022-09181-510.1007/s00170-022-09181-5 ↗
26. 10.3390/jcs703010110.3390/jcs7030101 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11310110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113101 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.05710.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.057 ↗
29. 10.1177/0731684423120507710.1177/07316844231205077 ↗
30. 10.3139/978344642871310.3139/9783446428713 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10381610.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103816 ↗
32. Freakley PK, Payne AR, Davey AB. Theory and practice of engineering with rubber. London: Applied Science Publishers, 1978.
33. 10.1177/0731684421105416610.1177/07316844211054166 ↗
34. ISO 7743:2017. Rubber vulcanized or thermoplastic—Determination of compression stress-strain properties. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization 2017.
35. 10.1177/095440541141181710.1177/0954405411411817 ↗
36. 10.1109/TMECH.2013.229497010.1109/TMECH.2013.2294970 ↗
37. 10.1080/14399776.2013.1078106710.1080/14399776.2013.10781067 ↗
38. 10.1115/1.405640510.1115/1.4056405 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.11.00310.1016/j.cirpj.2024.11.003 ↗