Transient response of carbon nanotubes with inhomogeneous coating under radial impact loading and magnetic field
Source abstract
Abstract
An analytical method is presented to solve magnetoelastic dynamic stress responses and perturbation of the magnetic field vector in carbon nanotubes with inhomogeneous costing subjected to radial internal pressure shock and axial magnetic field. By utilizing finite Hankle transforms and Laplace transforms, the analytical solution for magnetodynamic stress response and perturbation of an axial magnetic field vector in the carbon nanotubes with inhomogeneous coating are obtained. From example calculations both magnetodynamic stress and perturbation of the axial magnetic field vector in carbon nanotubes with inhomogeneous coating are described and discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering (State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering), Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. 10.1007/3-540-39947-X_1210.1007/3-540-39947-X_12 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00506-610.1016/S0169-4332(98)00506-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00012-410.1016/S1359-8368(02)00012-4 ↗
5. 10.1007/3-540-39947-X_1410.1007/3-540-39947-X_14 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.82.11810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.82.118 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.400567610.1115/1.4005676 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.347719510.1063/1.3477195 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.948510.1103/PhysRevB.57.9485 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1713610.1103/PhysRevB.60.17136 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.10.04810.1016/j.physleta.2004.10.048 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apm.2009.07.00510.1016/j.apm.2009.07.005 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.31310.1103/PhysRevLett.80.313 ↗
15. Wang Y · Chinese Phys · 2003 · 12 · 100710.1088/1009-1963/12/9/315 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.03910.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.039 ↗
17. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/1/00910.1088/0957-4484/17/1/009 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-410.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl049962k10.1021/nl049962k ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.414510.1103/PhysRevB.57.4145 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.177841510.1115/1.1778415 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23541510.1103/PhysRevB.65.235415 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.251110.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2511 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00213-010.1016/S0020-7683(03)00213-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00079-X10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00079-X ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23340710.1103/PhysRevB.65.233407 ↗
27. John KD. Electromagnetics . Published by McGrawHill, Inc., USA, 1984.
28. Lekhniskii SG · 1981
29. Fung YC · 1965
30. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90034-010.1016/0020-7225(65)90034-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.009 ↗
32. 10.1115/1.290147110.1115/1.2901471 ↗