Nanocrystalline–amorphous transitions in Al–Mo thin films: Bulk and surface evolution
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We investigate the bulk and surface features of the crystalline–amorphous transitions in binary Al–Mo alloy thin films as a function of Mo composition using transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and atomic force microscopy analysis, as well as thermodynamic modeling. Of the alloys tested, the minimum in the root mean square (rms) surface roughness and correlation length occurs at the Al–32 at.% Mo composition, which corresponds to the maximum volume fraction of the amorphous phase and the minimum volume fraction of the body centered cubic nanocrystallites. The rms surface roughness of the 32 at.% Mo films is on the order of a single nanometer, compared with nearly 80 nm for the 50 at.% Mo film. A structure–zone map is constructed to relate the surface morphology of the films to their bulk microstructure. A thermodynamic model developed by Miedema and coworkers was used to predict the general trends observed in the microstructural evolution as a function of film composition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Bülow · Zeitschrift für Physik Bd · 1956 · 145 · 14110.1007/BF01339052 ↗
2. Klement · Nature · 1960 · 187 · 86910.1038/187869b0 ↗
3. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2000 · 4 · 27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
4. Wang · Mater Sci Eng R · 2004 · 44 · 4510.1016/j.mser.2004.03.001 ↗
5. Faupel · Rev Mod Phys · 2003 · 75 · 23710.1103/RevModPhys.75.237 ↗
6. Liu · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2001 · 40 · 538210.1143/JJAP.40.5382 ↗
7. Jeong · J Microelectromech Sys · 2003 · 12 · 43
8. Lee · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 306310.1088/0957-4484/17/12/042 ↗
9. Luber · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 12570510.1088/0957-4484/19/12/125705 ↗
10. Ophus · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 12310810.1063/1.2841849 ↗
11. Inoue · Sci Tech Adv Mater · 2000 · 1 · 7310.1016/S1468-6996(00)00009-7 ↗
12. Hays · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
13. Calin · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 65310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00560-2 ↗
14. Eckert · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 301 · 110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01387-3 ↗
15. Frankel · J Electrochem Soc · 1993 · 140 · 219210.1149/1.2220794 ↗
16. Janikczachor · Corr Sci · 1994 · 36 · 192110.1016/0010-938X(94)90027-2 ↗
17. Habazaki · Corr Sci · 1995 · 37 · 149710.1016/0010-938X(95)00061-N ↗
18. 1990 · vol. 1 · 173
19. Streng · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 104107(1)10.1103/PhysRevB.73.104107 ↗
20. Thornton · J Vac Sci Technol · 1986 · 4 · 305910.1116/1.573628 ↗
21. Smereka · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 119110.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.013 ↗
22. Wild · J Appl Phys · 1990 · 68 · 97310.1063/1.346663 ↗
23. Paritosh · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 226910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00086-5 ↗
24. Valkealahti · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 945910.1103/PhysRevB.45.9459 ↗
25. Tong · Annu Rev Phys Chem · 1994 · 45 · 40110.1146/annurev.pc.45.100194.002153 ↗
26. Raible · Europhys Lett · 2000 · 45 · 6110.1209/epl/i2000-00235-7 ↗
27. Mayr · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 36015
28. Mayr · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1695010.1103/PhysRevB.60.16950 ↗
29. van der Kolk · J Less-Common Metals · 1988 · 145 · 110.1016/0022-5088(88)90257-3 ↗
30. Loeff · J Less-Common Metals · 1998 · 140 · 29910.1016/0022-5088(88)90390-6 ↗
31. Lopez · Phys Rev B · 1987 · 36 · 371610.1103/PhysRevB.36.3716 ↗
32. Tendler · Intermetallics · 2006 · 14 · 29710.1016/j.intermet.2005.06.008 ↗
33. de Tendler · J Mater Sci · 1992 · 27 · 493510.1007/BF01105256 ↗
34. Saunders · J Phase Eq · 1997 · 18 · 37010.1007/s11669-997-0063-1 ↗
35. Saunders · 1997