journal article·2007-05

Structure–dielectric property relationship for vanadium- and scandium-doped barium strontium titanate

Shaojun Liu, V.Y. Zenou, I. Sus, T. Kotani, M. van Schilfgaarde, N. Newman

Acta Materialia· Volume 55· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports the results of an investigation of the structure–property relationship of vanadium (donor) and scandium (acceptor) doped Ba 0.7 Sr 0.3 TiO 3 . While V doping produces a fully miscible Ba 0.7 Sr 0.3 Ti 1− x V x O 3 alloy, Sc doping results in an inhomogeneous microstructure with grains containing a Sc-doped Ba-rich shell and an undoped Sr-rich core. This results from a solution–precipitation process that works in combination with a thermodynamic driving force for the preferential segregation of Sc into Ba-rich regions. The Curie temperature ( T c ) of Ba 0.7 Sr 0.3 TiO 3 decreases with increasing dopant concentration from a T c of 40 °C for undoped material to 18 °C for 4 mol.% V and 22 °C for 4 mol.% Sc (i.e., Ba 0.7 Sr 0.3 Ti 0.96 V 0.04 O 3 , Ba 0.7 Sr 0.3 Ti 0.96 Sc 0.04 O 3 ). Sc- and V-doped materials are found to have significantly reduced dielectric constants at their Curie temperature than their undoped counterpart. This is most evident for Sc doping, where a 4 mol.% concentration has a dielectric constant of 1000 at T c , a factor of 12 times smaller than undoped Ba 0.7 Sr 0.3 TiO 3 .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Nalwa · 1999 · vol. 2
2. Park · J Am Ceram Soc · 1997 · 80 · 10610.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02797.x ↗
3. Macchesney · J Am Ceram Soc · 1963 · 46 · 19710.1111/j.1151-2916.1963.tb19771.x ↗
4. Lee · J Am Ceram Soc · 2000 · 83 · 140210.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01401.x ↗
5. Yoon · J Am Ceram Soc · 2003 · 86 · 8810.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03282.x ↗
6. Hennings · J Am Ceram Soc · 1984 · 67 · 24910.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb18841.x ↗
7. Johnson · J Appl Phys · 1962 · 33 · 282610.1063/1.1702558 ↗
8. Wu · J Am Ceram Soc · 2000 · 83 · 171310.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01455.x ↗
9. Luo · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 21410910.1103/PhysRevB.70.214109 ↗
10. Methfessel · 2000 · vol. 535 · 114
11. Andersen · Phys Rev B · 1975 · 12 · 306010.1103/PhysRevB.12.3060 ↗
12. Zunger · Phys Rev Lett · 1990 · 65 · 35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
13. Kim · J Am Ceram Soc · 1999 · 82 · 108510.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01882.x ↗
14. Moulson · 2003
15. Liou · J Am Ceram Soc · 1997 · 80 · 309310.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03237.x ↗
16. Jung · Mater Res Bull · 2002 · 37 · 163310.1016/S0025-5408(02)00813-9 ↗
17. Randall · J Mater Res · 1993 · 8 · 87110.1557/JMR.1993.0871 ↗
18. Park · J Mater Res · 1995 · 10 · 277010.1557/JMR.1995.2770 ↗
19. Armstrong · J Am Ceram Soc · 1990 · 73 · 126810.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05190.x ↗
20. Osak · J Phys D · 1989 · 22 · 174610.1088/0022-3727/22/11/028 ↗
21. Kittel · Phys Rev · 1951 · 83 · 45810.1103/PhysRev.83.458 ↗
22. Devonshire · Philos Mag · 1951 · 42 · 106510.1080/14786445108561354 ↗
23. Chaudhuri · J Phys Chem Solids · 1989 · 50 · 114910.1016/0022-3697(89)90024-3 ↗