A High-Damping Magnesium Matrix to Limit Fatigue in Composite
Source abstract
Abstract
Two phase composites, which consist in a magnesium matrix reinforced with either Mg 2 Si, C, Si C aligned long fibres or A1 2 0 3 short fibres have been processed. These lightweight composites exhibit a damping capacity which is 10 to 100 times higher than the one of an industrial magnesium cast alloy such as AZ63 and a high Young's modulus. The high damping capacity is interpreted as due to dislocation dissipative mechanisms in the Mg matrix, and the good mechanical properties as due to the fibres. Moreover, the mechanical loss spectra obtained by mechanical spectroscopy are modified by transitory phenomena which appear during thermal cycling. The transient response informs us about the thermal stress relaxation mechanism occurring at ceramic-metal interfaces and thereby about the interface quality and the fatigue behaviour. The comparison between the experimental results and a model of dislocation motion allows one to interpret the relaxation mechanism as due to dislocations which dissipate energy through vibrations, which are controlled by a solid friction mechanism. Furthermore, the composites do not exhibit thermal fatigue over more than 100 thermal cycles (100 K-500 K).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ecole Polytechnique Fέdέrale de Lausanne, Institut de Gέnie Atomique, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Van Fleteren · Advanced Materials & Processes · 1996 · 5 · 33
2. K. Sugimoto · Mem. Inst. Sci. Res. · 1978 · 35 · 31
3. 3. R. Schaller and J. Van Humbeeck, Materials Science Forum, 119-121, 803-808, 1993.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.119-121.803 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00091-210.1016/S1359-6454(96)00091-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/0956-7151(91)90261-X10.1016/0956-7151(91)90261-X ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0115495210.1007/BF01154952 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0267125910.1007/BF02671259 ↗
8. 10.1016/0921-5093(93)90687-A10.1016/0921-5093(93)90687-A ↗
9. S.E. Urreta · J. Phys. IV · 1996 · 6 · C8
10. 10. S.M. Seyed Reihani, C. Esnouf, G. Fantozzi and G. Revel, J. de Physique , 42, C5145-C5145, 1981.10.1051/jphyscol:1981522 ↗
11. 10.2320/matertrans1960.18.27710.2320/matertrans1960.18.277 ↗
12. 12. W. Riehemann, Proc. of Magnesium Alloys and their Applications, 61-70, 1998.
13. F. Chmell'k · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 38 · 81
14. X. Carbonneau
15. C. Mayencourt
16. 10.1002/1521-396X(199710)163:2<357::AID-PSSA357>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/1521-396X(199710)163:2<357::AID-PSSA357>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
17. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00649-210.1016/S0921-5093(98)00649-2 ↗
18. A.S. Nowick · 1972
19. M. Taya · 1989
20. 20. J. Kiehn, Z. Trojanovd, P. Lukdc and K.U. Kainer, Key Engineering Materials, 127-131, 993-1000, 1997.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.127-131.993 ↗
21. 21. C. Mayencourt and R. Schaller, Proc. of Magnesium Alloys and their Applications, 163-167, 1998.