journal article·2015-02Open access

The role of nickel in radiation damage of ferritic alloys

Y. Osetsky, N. Anento, A. Serra, D. Terentyev

Acta Materialia· Volume 84

Abstract

According to modern theory, damage evolution under neutron irradiation depends on the fraction of self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) produced in the form of one-dimensional glissile clusters. These clusters, having a low interaction cross-section with other defects, are absorbed mainly by grain boundaries and dislocations, creating the so-called production bias. It is known empirically that the addition of certain alloying elements influences many radiation effects, including swelling; however, the mechanisms are unknown in many cases. In this paper we report the results of an extensive multi-technique atomistic level modeling study of SIA clusters mobility in body-centered cubic Fe-Ni alloys. We have found that Ni interacts strongly with the periphery of clusters, affecting their mobility. The total effect is defined by the number of Ni atoms interacting with the cluster at the same time and can be significant, even in low-Ni alloys. Thus a 1 nm (37SIAs) cluster is practically immobile at T < 500 K in the Fe-0.8 at.% Ni alloy. Increasing cluster size and Ni content enhances cluster immobilization. This effect should have quite broad consequences in void swelling, matrix damage accumulation and radiation induced hardening and the results obtained help to better understand and predict the effects of radiation in Fe-Ni ferritic alloys. Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Odette · JOM · 2001 · 53 · 1810.1007/s11837-001-0081-0 ↗
2. Dudarev · J. Nucl. Mat. · 2009 · 386–388 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.301 ↗
3. Radiation damage theory
4. Singh · Nature · 1973 · 224 · 142
5. Hudson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1971 · 41 · 24110.1016/0022-3115(71)90163-2 ↗
6. Norris · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1971 · 40 · 6610.1016/0022-3115(71)90117-6 ↗
7. Farrell · 1972 · 376
8. Zinkle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1989 · 168 · 26210.1016/0022-3115(89)90591-6 ↗
9. S.I. Golubov, A.V. Barashev, R.E. Stoller, On the Origin of Radiation Growth of HCP Crystals, ORNL/TM-2011/473, 2011.
10. Breakthrough in understanding radiation growth of zirconium
11. Norgett · Nucl. Eng. Design · 1975 · 33 · 5010.1016/0029-5493(75)90035-7 ↗
12. Odette · Scr. Metall. · 1983 · 17 · 118310.1016/0036-9748(83)90280-6 ↗
13. Hoelzer · Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1995 · 373 · 5710.1557/PROC-373-57 ↗
14. J. Kočík, E. Keilová, M. Brumovský, PERFECT_Report:D1–3.8., 2011.
15. Debarberis · J Nuc. Mater. · 2005 · 336 · 21010.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.002 ↗
16. ASTM Standard E 900, Predicting Radiation-Induced Transition Temperature Shift in Reactor Vessel Materials, E706 (IIF). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2002, 2007.
17. Mendelev · Phil. Mag. · 2003 · A83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
18. Bonny · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 02501010.1088/0965-0393/17/2/025010 ↗
19. Voter · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1987 · 82 · 17510.1557/PROC-82-175 ↗
20. G. Samolyuk, Kh. Odbadrakh, Y.N. Osetsky, R. Stoller, D. Nicholson, G.M. Stocks, Interaction of Cr and Ni solute atoms with core of ½<111> screw and edge dislocations in bcc Fe. Center for Defect Physics, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, unpublished manuscript.
21. Anento · Model. Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18 · 02500810.1088/0965-0393/18/2/025008 ↗
22. Terentev · Philos. Mag. · 2008 · 88 · 2110.1080/14786430701727513 ↗
23. Defects and diffusion in metals – annual retrospective III
24. Bacon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.002 ↗
25. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 4910.1016/S0022-3115(97)00256-0 ↗
26. Primary radiation damage formation
27. Souidi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 355 · 8910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.009 ↗
28. Calder · Phil. Mag. Lett. · 2008 · 88 · 4310.1080/09500830701733004 ↗
29. Osetsky · Phil. Mag. A · 2000 · 80 · 213110.1080/01418610008212155 ↗
30. Barashev · Phil. Mag. A · 2000 · 80 · 270910.1080/01418610008216500 ↗
31. Osetsky · Phil. Mag. A · 2003 · 83 · 6110.1080/0141861021000016793 ↗
32. Singh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 10310.1016/S0022-3115(97)00231-6 ↗
33. Zinkle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 199 · 17310.1016/0022-3115(93)90140-T ↗
34. Trinkaus · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 9110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00230-4 ↗
35. Xu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 26550310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.265503 ↗
36. Terentyev · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 144410.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.021 ↗
37. Pelfort · Phil. Mag. Lett. · 2001 · 81 · 80310.1080/09500830110095171 ↗
38. Puigvi · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2004 · A365 · 10110.1016/j.msea.2003.09.013 ↗
39. Achievements within the FP6/PERFECT project, J. Nucl. Mater. 406 (2010) 1–204.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.006 ↗
40. Hernández-Mayoral · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 399 · 14610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.013 ↗
41. Eldrup · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 26910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00186-5 ↗