Role of temperatures and fiber orientations on transverse shear damping of polypropylene honeycomb sandwich structures
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports the effect of temperatures (30℃ to 80℃, with incremental steps of 5℃) and orientations of the glass fibers (0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°) on the dynamic properties (the loss factors and the natural frequencies) of polypropylene honeycomb sandwich composites. The impulse technique has been employed to calculate the natural frequency and loss factor of the sandwich specimens under different temperatures. The natural frequency and loss factor values have also been calculated theoretically using Blevins's formulae for natural frequency, and Yim et al.'s transverse shear effect, respectively. The values of damping loss factor and the natural frequency/stiffness are the maximum at 0° fiber orientation in the skins of the sandwich specimen. The loss factor of the same oriented specimen increases sharply with the increase in temperature. The main reasons for the above are the higher in-plane strength of skins and lower transverse shear strength of the honeycomb core. Hence, the 0° fiber oriented sandwich specimen is more desirable than the other fiber oriented specimens at all temperatures. A good agreement is observed between the experimental and theoretical values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, S.A. Engineering College, Chennai, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai, India
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.04410.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.044 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-008-2694-y10.1007/s10853-008-2694-y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.02810.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.028 ↗
4. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90058-210.1016/0266-3538(94)90058-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.031 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00073-X10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00073-X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.10.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.10.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00103-010.1016/S0266-3538(96)00103-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.08.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.08.025 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.024 ↗
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90091-T10.1016/0266-3538(93)90091-T ↗
12. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90168-610.1016/0266-3538(94)90168-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00182-110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00182-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00051-510.1016/S0263-8223(03)00051-5 ↗
15. Daniel IM, Ishai O. Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 411.
16. Blevins RD. Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape, 1st edn. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 1979, pp. 492.
17. 10.1177/073168441037140410.1177/0731684410371404 ↗
18. 10.1177/073168440808888710.1177/0731684408088887 ↗
19. 10.1177/073168441453079010.1177/0731684414530790 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168440708136810.1177/0731684407081368 ↗
21. 10.1177/073168441142939410.1177/0731684411429394 ↗
22. 10.1177/073168441036972110.1177/0731684410369721 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168440809345410.1177/0731684408093454 ↗
24. 10.1177/073168440808951410.1177/0731684408089514 ↗
25. Nagasankar P · Int J Mech Sci · 2014 · 39 · 279
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.007 ↗