Impact Studies in Elastomer, Fly Ash, and Hybrid-filled Epoxy Composites: Part I - Room Temperature Curing
Source abstract
Abstract
This study involves a system where epoxy as matrix and two reinforcements, namely an elastomer and a less dense oxide known as fly ash, differing in their response to mechanical loading to yield hybrid composite, are used. As rubber particles are known for their resistance to dynamic loading situations, poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene), carboxyl terminated, CTBN as the elastomer constitutes the first of the filler. The incorporation of rigid fly ash, as a second filler, has been made to see the change in the behavior in the response to the impact test. Their roles as individual fillers as well as hybrid fillers are studied at various compositions. The directly observed experimental values such as total energy and the derived data like ductility index (DI) are catalogued. While the fly ash-bearing composites show maximum absorption of energy at 3% by weight, the rubber-bearing ones display the same trend at 1%. The values recorded for the hybrid type having 1% were high. The DI showed highest values for the maximum filler bearing compositions in all cases. The scanning electron micrographs of the impact-failed samples helped in understanding the trends seen in the impact data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Polymer Composites Laboratory, Department of Metallurgy, Centre for Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012, India,
Polymer Composites Laboratory, Department of Metallurgy, Centre for Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012, India
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Potter, W. G. · 1970
2. Nielsen, L. E. · 1974
3. 10.1002/app.1990.07039080210.1002/app.1990.070390802 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00194-X10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00194-X ↗
5. 10.1023/A:100482652906510.1023/A:1004826529065 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.1151910.1002/app.11519 ↗
7. Nigam, V. · 757
8. 10.1002/app.1983.07028021510.1002/app.1983.070280215 ↗
9. Tod, D. A. and Wolfe, S. V. (1988). Deformation, Yield and Fracture of Polymers VII, Apr. 11-14, Plastic and Rubber Institute, Cambridge, UK , p. 98/1.
10. Kubouchi, M. · (Journal of Network Polymer, Japan) · 2002 · 23 · 2
11. 10.2472/jsms.48.138610.2472/jsms.48.1386 ↗
12. DiBerardino, M. F. · 239
13. 10.1177/073168440504355710.1177/0731684405043557 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-94-017-5349-4_210.1007/978-94-017-5349-4_2 ↗
15. ASTM C 618 Standard Specification for Coal Fly ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for use as a Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete, ASTM, Pa, USA.
16. Narasimha Rao, A. V.
17. 10.1007/BF0240264910.1007/BF02402649 ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000502)76:5<623::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000502)76:5<623::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
19. 10.1002/adv.1001210.1002/adv.10012 ↗
20. 10.1081/PPT-12000256610.1081/PPT-120002566 ↗
21. Dong, Y. · Journal of Metallurgical Society) · 1999 · 27 · 37