Calculation of axial compression performance and bearing capacity of hollow sandwich glass fiber-reinforced polymer-concrete-steel double-skin tubular column
Source abstract
Abstract
To evaluate the axial compressive performance of the hollow sandwich GFRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns (DSTC), 15 composite column specimens were produced to study the effect of various design variables. And the study presents a rational and accurate finite element (FE) model that provides a detailed working mechanism of the DSTCs, leading to the enrichment of parametric research and the creation of an extensive database. Based upon the unified strength theory of double shear, limit equilibrium theory, and superposition theory, the study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of different bearing capacity calculation models. With each added millimeter in the thickness of the GFRP tube, the ultimate bearing capacity of the DSTC specimen increased by 23.6% and 61.8%, respectively, compared to that of the 1.5 mm thick GFRP tube sample. The lower the hollow ratio of the DSTC section, the higher its ultimate bearing capacity. Specimens with a hollow ratio of 0.3 and 0.43 showed an ultimate bearing capacity 1.4 times and 1.25 times higher, respectively, than those with a hollow ratio of 0.6. The study observes a relatively high level of precision in the results of the ultimate equilibrium theory, with an average error rate of 20%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Ningxia Center for Research on Earthquake Protection and Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
Xinhua College, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Ningxia Natural Science Fund Project · First-Class Discipline Construction Project of Ningxia University
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1260/136943304165355210.1260/1369433041653552 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.017 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00040-010.1016/S0950-0618(03)00040-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.006 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1604156410.3390/ma16041564 ↗
6. Newhook JP · Arab J Sci Eng · 2006 · 31 · 53
7. 10.1007/s10443-012-9286-310.1007/s10443-012-9286-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.11.01110.1016/j.measurement.2013.11.011 ↗
9. Teng JG, Yu T, Wong YL. Behavior of hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on FRP Compo-sites in Civil Engineering, Adelaide, Australia, 8–10 December 2004, 2004; 811–818.10.1201/9780203970850.ch91 ↗
10. Yu T · 2007
11. Zhang B, Yu T, Teng JG. Axial compression tests on hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns filled with high strength concrete. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Postgraduate Conference on Infrastructure and Environment, Hong Kong, China, 11–12 July 2011, 2011; 171–176.
12. 10.1260/1369-4332.18.5.71510.1260/1369-4332.18.5.715 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11422210.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114222 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000033110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000331 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11031910.1016/j.tws.2022.110319 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.029 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000080010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000800 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000081810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000818 ↗
19. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-408610.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4086 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.014 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.013 ↗
22. Liu MX · 2007
23. 10.1016/j.tws.2012.06.00310.1016/j.tws.2012.06.003 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000051010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000510 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2010.01.00710.1016/j.tws.2010.01.007 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11339310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113393 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000237310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002373 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11613510.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116135 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0132610.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01326 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000012110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000121 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.03110.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.031 ↗
32. Qian JR · J Build Struct · 2008 · 29 · 1104
33. Zhang B · Ind Constr · 2019 · 49 · 195
34. Wang J · Ind Constr · 2011 · 41 · 130
35. Ren ZG · Build Struct · 2021 · 51 · 37
36. Jin L · J Hyd Eng · 2019 · 50 · 409
37. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.03910.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.039 ↗
38. Wang J · J Xi’an Univ Arch Tech (Nat Sci) · 2013 · 45 · 633
39. Liu W · 2005
40. Yu MH · 2011
41. Gao DY · China J Hwy Transp · 2015 · 25 · 43
42. Wen JP · 2011