journal article·2022-07

Fibre alignment and mechanical performance of carbon fibre Sheet Moulding Compounds under different preform compaction

Biruk F Nega, Robert S Pierce, Linlin Liu, Xiaosu Yi, Xiaoling Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

This work investigates the effect of preform compaction on the mechanical performance and flow-induced fibre alignment of carbon fibre reinforced Sheet Moulding Compounds (SMCs). Two groups of panels have been compression moulded from reclaimed carbon fibre tows in vinyl-ester resin with low (0.5 MPa) and high (10 MPa) preform compaction pressure Additionally, a low-cost fibre orientation analysis method has been further improved in terms of reliability, and a novel flow assessment method has been developed for carbon fibre SMCs. This approach revealed greater fibre alignment with the flow direction in the lower faces of panels as a result of greater contact time with the heated mould and a lower charge viscosity at the time of pressing. As expected, greater fibre alignment in the flow direction was observed outside the initial charge coverage area in both types of panels, where the flow was greatest. Due to additional fibre flow during the high-pressure compaction stage, the mean degree of flow alignment in the high compaction panel was 47% higher than that of the low compaction panel. Improvements in the tensile stiffness (8%) and strength (32%) were also observed as a result of the high-pressure compaction stage and associated flow alignment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Ningbo, China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Harper LT · 2006
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.020 ↗
3. 10.1179/174328910X1264708090249310.1179/174328910X12647080902493 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.19710.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.197 ↗
5. Brosius D · 2007
6. Bruderick M, Denton D, Shinedling M, et al. Applications of carbon fiber SMC for the Dodge Viper. Proceedings to Automotive Composites Conference & Exhibition (ACCE), Detroit, 2013.
7. Austin M · 2011
8. 10.1177/002199830809815110.1177/0021998308098151 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0034-3617(01)80207-110.1016/S0034-3617(01)80207-1 ↗
11. Vyakarnam MN · 2000
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10560010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105600 ↗
14. Schmachtenberg E · Zeitschrift Kunststofftechnik/Journal Plast. Technol · 2005 · 6
15. Kuhn C, Ton Y, Taeger O, et al. Experimental study on fiber matrix separation during compression molding of fiber reinforced rib structures. Proceedings of the Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE) Annual Technical Conference (ANTEC), Orlando, USA, 2018, pp. 7–10.
16. 10.1533/978085709625810.1533/9780857096258 ↗
17. Davis B · 2003
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.019 ↗
19. Olsson NEJ · ICCM Int. Conf. Compos. Mater · 2009 · C2.13
20. 10.1016/0377-0257(87)80040-X10.1016/0377-0257(87)80040-X ↗
21. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90016-910.1016/0266-3538(87)90016-9 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00521-010.1016/S0924-0136(01)00521-0 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10443-017-9642-410.1007/s10443-017-9642-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.13810.1016/j.procir.2014.01.138 ↗
25. 10.1177/073168440808888310.1177/0731684408088883 ↗
26. 10.1177/073168442093486810.1177/0731684420934868 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.010 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.021 ↗
29. 10.1122/1.54994510.1122/1.549945 ↗
30. Krenchel H · 1964
31. International Organization for Standardization · 1997