Influence of ply blocking on tensile stiffness in woven flax–carbon hybrids
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of carbon ply blocking on tensile stiffness in interlaminar flax–carbon epoxy hybrids is studied through various lamination schemes of similar nominal fiber volume fractions. Finite element mesoscale analysis accounting for distortions induced during compaction in the thinner carbon plies as a result of crimp mismatch was conducted. These distortions are shown to undermine hybrid stiffness, the extent of which is less pronounced when plies are blocked due to fewer hybrid interfaces, denoting that higher stiffness is achievable with blocked carbon plies. Backed by experimental evidences, it is suggested that detailed analysis on hybrid stiffness should treat hybrid interface as an independent variable a priori, and that modeling tools for carbon–flax fiber reinforced composites should consider not only the nonlinearity of flax response but also the waviness of both fabrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A-STAR), Singapore, Singapore
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Council
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.006 ↗
3. 10.3923/jas.2008.3709.371410.3923/jas.2008.3709.3714 ↗
4. Lee HP · J Nat Fibers · 2016 · 14 · 1
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-210.1007/s11837-006-0234-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.004 ↗
9. 10.1177/073168441243949410.1177/0731684412439494 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.014 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168441244432510.1177/0731684412444325 ↗
12. Chensong D. Review of natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 2018; 37: 331–34810.1177/0731684417745368 ↗
13. 10.1177/073168441351639310.1177/0731684413516393 ↗
14. 10.1177/073168441561845910.1177/0731684415618459 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168441558107110.1177/0731684415581071 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.repl.2017.02.00110.1016/j.repl.2017.02.001 ↗
17. Beck M. Carbon fiber prices could drop by as much as 90 percent. Composites Manufacturing Magazine , http://compositesmanufacturingmagazine.com/2014/10/carbon-fiber-prices-drop-much-90-percent/ (2014, accessed 4 September 2017).
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.07410.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.074 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.016 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.16410.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.164 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.12.01310.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.12.013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.00810.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.052 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831246612210.1177/0021998312466122 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.035 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00091-710.1016/S0266-3538(96)00091-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.09310.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.093 ↗
30. Ravandi M, Teo WS, Tran LQN, et al. Effects of the natural fiber stitching on the impact and compression after impact response of the flax/epoxy composites. In: 17th European Conference on Composite Materials, Munich, Germany, 26-30 June 2016.
31. Schulze P and, Heider D. Variability in aerospace VARTM processing. In: Eighth international conference on flow processes in composite materials, Douai, France, 11 – 13 July 2006.The paper was published online at UR:https://www.fose1.plymouth.ac.uk/sme/FPCM/FPCM08/FPCM8/papers/FPCM8_46.pdf
32. D30 Committee. Test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2014.
33. 10.1007/978-90-481-3141-9_910.1007/978-90-481-3141-9_9 ↗
34. Axson Technologies. Epolam 5015 resin data sheet . n.d. Axson Technologies. URL: http://www.axsontechnologies.com
35. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.02710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.027 ↗
36. Zhong Y · J Mater Sci · 2017 · 1
37. 10.1520/CTR10143J10.1520/CTR10143J ↗