journal article·2010-03

Crack Initiation Process of DCB Specimens Based on First-order Shear Deformation Theory

Zhenyu Ouyang, Guoqiang Li, Samuel Ibekwe, Michael Stubblefield, Su-Seng Pang

Publisher page

Abstract

The current work develops an analytical model which can consider the crack initiation process of double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens. The current model is based on the first-order shear deformation beam theory, and thus includes the effect of shear deformation in the beams on the crack initiation process. The relationship between the remote peel load P and loadline deflection u is explicitly established based on a parametric equation of crack tip separation δ for the crack initiation process. The nonlinear response in the ascending branch of the loading process is captured by the present analytical model. With properly defined cohesive laws (such as exponential type), it might not be necessary to define a clear final separation δ f for the crack propagation. The comprehensive comparisons with test and numerical results validate the accuracy of the present model for predicting the crack initiation and propagation of DCB specimens. This model can be used for predicting the debonding process of adhesively bonded composite joints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA, , Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern University, Baton Rouge LA 70813, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern University, Baton Rouge LA 70813, USA

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Barenblatt, G.I. · General Ideas and Hypothesis, Axisymmetrical Cracks, PMM · 1959 · 23 · 434
2. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
3. 10.1115/1.317306410.1115/1.3173064 ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90001-K10.1016/0022-5096(90)90001-K ↗
5. 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90170-810.1016/0921-5093(90)90170-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-310.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
7. 10.1088/0965-0393/1/2/00110.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001 ↗
8. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-310.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00013-410.1016/S1359-8368(98)00013-4 ↗
10. Kanninen, M.F. · International Journal of Fracture · 1973 · 9 · 8310.1007/BF00035958 ↗
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-410.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0001263510.1007/BF00012635 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00095-310.1016/S0022-5096(01)00095-3 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0001887010.1007/BF00018870 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.03910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
16. 10.1023/A:101862771273910.1023/A:1018627712739 ↗
17. 10.1023/A:102399801325510.1023/A:1023998013255 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.183510.1103/PhysRevB.28.1835 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10704-006-0075-610.1007/s10704-006-0075-6 ↗