Vegetal fibre composites for semi-structural applications in the medical environment
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical behaviour of flax/polylactic acid (flax/PLA) and flax/polypropylene (flax/PP) bio-composites exposed to a medical environment (disinfectant and cleaning treatments) is studied for a use as a semi-structural part. Immersion tests in the different cleaning products were performed for both bio-composites in order to measure the absorption kinetic and monitor the evolution of the mechanical properties in the severe conditions. Pseudo-Fickian and Fickian behaviour were used to describe the absorption of the bio-composites. The absorption of the cleaning product results in a major loss of the mechanical properties. It was found that Terralin® is the most aggressive cleaning product followed by Surfanios® and water. However, coating the surfaces of these bio-composites could be a practical solution for increasing their durability in wet environments by reducing the sorption kinetics. The use of environmental friendly coatings such as layers of PLA should be favoured in an eco-design approach. In order to quantify in terms of absorption, the cleaning operation used in the medical environment and cleaning cycles were reproduced during a week. It was shown that the weight gained by the bio-composite during one cleaning cycle is very low, 1.98% of the initial mass in the worst case. Moreover, it was also shown that the initial weight is recovered before each cleaning cycle. Therefore, the saturated state is never reached in service condition, and only a low reduction of the mechanical properties (−5.3% and −7.6% of the tensile strength and modulus, respectively) has been observed. This shows that the flax/PLA and flax/PP bio-composites submitted to disinfectant and cleaning cycles can be used in a medical environment. Based on these conditions, a dimensioning strategy has been proposed for the parts submitted to the periodic cleaning treatments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire PRISME, Université d’Orléans, Léonard de Vinci, Orléans, France
Gemtex, ENSAIT, Roubaix, France
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.01410.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.04810.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.048 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.024 ↗
4. Bos H. The potential of flax fibres as reinforcement for composite materials , Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2004.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.02510.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.008 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00294-710.1016/S0021-9797(03)00294-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.02410.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.03.02510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.03.025 ↗
13. Duigou AL, Deux JM and Baley C. Protection of flax/PLLA biocomposites from seawater ageing by external layers of PLLA. Int J Polym Sci. Epub ahead of print 2011. DOI: 10.1155/2011/235805:8.10.1155/2011/235805 ↗
14. 10.1023/A:102658192222110.1023/A:1026581922221 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2258010.1002/pc.22580 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019 ↗
17. Placet V · JNC 16 Toulouse · 2009 · 10
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00080-510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00080-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.018 ↗
21. Sathishkumar TP, Naveen J and Satheeshkumar S. Hybrid fiber reinforced polymer composites − a review. J Reinf Plast Compos . 2014; 33: 454–471.10.1177/0731684413516393 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.004 ↗
24. Grandidier JC. Effet de l’environnement sur la durabilité des composites. Colloque MECAMAT-AUSSOIS . January 2011 (in french).
25. Mortaigne B. Vieillissement des composites: mécanismes et méthodologie d’étude. Tech L'ingénieur 2005; Référence AM5320: 1–21 (in french).10.51257/a-v1-cor112 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.00610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.03010.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.030 ↗
29. Moothoo J. Analyse de la faisabilité d'éco-conception de pièces composites à base de ressources renouvelables pour application médicales . PhD Thesis, University of Orleans, 2013 (in french).
30. Dossier HYGIENE SPECIALISEE: L'entretien, la désinfection des blocs opératoires. Centre de coordination de lutte contre les infections nosocomiales . 1995; 1: 1–123. (in french).
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.015 ↗
32. Scida D · Comptes Rendus des JNC · 2011 · 17 · 1
33. Fayolle B and Verdu J. Vieillissement physique des matériaux polymères. Tech L'ingénieur 2005; AM3150: 1–19. (in french).10.51257/a-v1-cor108 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.01310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.013 ↗