journal article·2019-05

Assessing models for the prediction of mechanical properties for the recycled short fibre composites

Mohammad S Rouhi, Magdalena Juntikka, Johan Landberg, Maciej Wysocki

Publisher page

Abstract

Processing of polymer fibre composites has a remarkable influence on their mechanical performance. These mechanical properties are even more influenced when using recycled reinforcement. Therefore, we place particular attention on the evaluation of micromechanical models to estimate the mechanical properties and compare them against the experimental results of the manufactured composites from recycled carbon fibre material. For the manufacturing process, an epoxy matrix and carbon fibre production cut-offs as reinforcing material are incorporated using a vacuum infusion process. In addition, continuous textile reinforcement in combination with the epoxy matrix is used as reference material to evaluate the degradation of mechanical performance of the recycled composite. The experimental results show higher degradation of the composite strength compared to the stiffness properties. Observations from the modelling also show the same trend as the deviation between the theoretical and experimental results is lower for stiffness comparisons than the strength calculations. Yet still, good mechanical performance for specific applications can be expected from these materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

RISE SICOMP AB, Mölndal, Sweden

RISE IVF AB, Mölndal, Sweden

RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB, Department of Chemistry and Materials, Borås, Sweden

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0034-3617(07)70051-610.1016/S0034-3617(07)70051-6 ↗
2. Reinforced Plastics Nov/Dec 2014, www.reinforcedplastics.com (accessed 29 December 2018).
3. 10.1179/146580109X1254099504568810.1179/146580109X12540995045688 ↗
4. Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the circular economy, Brussels, 2.12, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ (2015, accessed 29 December 2018).
5. 10.1177/089270570504500610.1177/0892705705045006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.030 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0034-3617(10)70063-110.1016/S0034-3617(10)70063-1 ↗
8. Wood K. · Composites · 2010 · 3 · 1
9. 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.05.01510.1016/j.supflu.2014.05.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.017 ↗
11. Line S. Commercialisation of the carbon fibre recycling process. In: Carbon fibre recycling and reuse conference , IntertechPira, Hamburg, Germany, 27 November 2009.
12. 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.01910.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.019 ↗
13. Carberry W. Boeing AERO magazine QRT 4.08, 6, 2008.
14. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.12.02810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.12.028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.01.00510.1016/j.jaap.2011.01.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.supflu.2016.08.01510.1016/j.supflu.2016.08.015 ↗
20. Magdalena S . Development and characteristics of a fully recycled CF/PP composite . Doctoral Thesis, Luleå Technical University, Luleå, Sweden, 2011
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.028 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.11.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.11.014 ↗
25. 10.1177/073168440808888310.1177/0731684408088883 ↗
26. Pimenta S, Ahuja A, Yong A. Damage tolerant tow-based discontinuous composites. In: Proceedings of 20th international conference on composite materials , Copenhagen, Denmark, 19–24 July, 2015.
27. 10.1177/002199831561312910.1177/0021998315613129 ↗
28. 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
30. Tsai SW · 1980
31. Halpin JC · 1967
32. Harris B. Engineering composite materials . 2nd ed. London. Maney Publishing, 1999.
33. Toho Tenax America Inc. Data sheet Tenax®-J and -E. Data Sheet, (2012, accessed 25 February 2016). 2012
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.002 ↗
36. Huntsman Advanced Materials Americas LLC. Araldite® LY 5052 Aradur® 5052. Data Sheet, (2010, accessed 18 February 2016).
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.011 ↗
38. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0120348110.1007/BF01203481 ↗
40. Taya M, Arsenault RJ. Metal matrix composites. Oxford: Pergamon, 1989, pp.63–101.
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.005 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.001 ↗