An experimental study of the influence from fibre architecture on the permeability of 3D-woven textiles
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work experimental measurements of the permeability of fully interlaced 3D-woven carbon fibre preforms are performed using the unsaturated parallel flow method. The effect on the permeability from three different parameters is studied by altering the architecture of woven preforms and varying mould sizes in a duct flow set-up. Influences from the geometrically different surface layers of the woven preforms, from fibre volume fraction and from warp yarn crimp are studied. The measurements show negligible influence on the permeability from crimp and the fraction of weave surface layers while the fibre volume fraction has a prominent influence. However, the effect is not consistent in terms of fibre volume fraction variation alone but depends on how it is varied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00058-510.1016/S1359-835X(99)00058-5 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.75016060210.1002/pc.750160602 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00028-610.1016/S1359-835X(97)00028-6 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831036958610.1177/0021998310369586 ↗
5. Xiao X, Zeng X, Long AC, et al. Modeling of through-thickness permeability for 3D woven fabrics. In: Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on 3D Fabrics and Their Applications [1-84626-049-3], 2010, pp.206–211.
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00028-Z10.1016/1359-835X(95)00028-Z ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.1009710.1002/pc.10097 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.1058910.1002/pc.10589 ↗
10. 10.1177/07316844970160010510.1177/073168449701600105 ↗
11. 10.1177/002199830404558510.1177/0021998304045585 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.021 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0120923910.1007/BF01209239 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.76014060310.1002/pen.760140603 ↗
16. Foley FM and Gutowski T. The effect of process variables on permeability in the flexible resin transfer molding (FRTM) process. In: Proceedings of the 36th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition , 1991, 326–340.
17. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00049-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00049-5 ↗
18. 10.1080/0040500010865957010.1080/00405000108659570 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.019 ↗
20. 10.1080/0040500020863055210.1080/00405000208630552 ↗
21. Mohamed MH · SAMPE J · 2001 · 37 · 8
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.009 ↗
24. 10.1177/004051751247174210.1177/0040517512471742 ↗
25. Andersson HM. Visualisation of composites manufacturing . PhD Thesis, Luleå Tekniska Universitet, 2003.
26. 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v38.i6.8010.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v38.i6.80 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.022 ↗
28. 10.1177/07316844950140100610.1177/073168449501401006 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.008 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.1060710.1002/pc.10607 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.1047410.1002/pc.10474 ↗
32. 10.1177/00405175030730060310.1177/004051750307300603 ↗