Axial Experiment on CFRP Confined Steel Reinforced Concrete Columns with Partial Deteriorated Strength
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the mechanical behavior of columns with partial deteriorated strength and to evaluate the availability of the partial confinement. Five steel reinforced concrete columns have been tested. Different layers of CFRP sheets have been wrapped on the deteriorated strength part. Columns are subjected to axial compression until failure. Axial load, and axial and transverse strains are measured to investigate confinement levels supplied by CFRP sheets. Experimental results indicate that both the load capacity and the ductility of the deteriorated strength part could be significantly increased, subsequently; the load capacity of the entire column can be enhanced higher than those of the original columns. An existing analytical model on FRP reinforcement is used to predict the ultimate load and to evaluate the improvement effectiveness of partial confinement. The prediction provided by theoretical model shows good agreement with the experimental results. Findings of this paper show that partial confinement on deteriorated parts of concrete columns would be developed as an alternative to diminish cost and time consumption in practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology Dalian 116024, China, Henan Provincial Communications Quality Control Station, Zhengzhou 450006, China,
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology Dalian 116024, China
School of Water Conservancy and Environment Engineering, Zhengzhou Unversity Zhengzhou 450001, China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1139/l98-06710.1139/l98-067 ↗
2. Saadatmanesh, H. · Structural Journal · 1994 · 91 · 434
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.050 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(129)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(129) ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175) ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0248315310.1007/BF02483153 ↗
7. 10.1260/136943304165355210.1260/1369433041653552 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
9. Demers, M. · Canadian Society of Civil Engineering · 1994 · 91 · 895
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1997)9:4(185)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1997)9:4(185) ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:2(90)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:2(90) ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-8368(00)00021-410.1016/S1359-8368(00)00021-4 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(583)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(583) ↗
14. Shahawy, M. · International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition (Proceedings) · 1996 · 41 · 1311
15. Toutanji, H.A. · ACI Materials Journal · 1999 · 96 · 397
16. Xiao, J.Z. · Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University · 2004 · 32 · 990
17. 10.1177/073168440303542910.1177/0731684403035429 ↗
18. Lam, L.
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:5(612)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:5(612) ↗
20. 10.12989/sem.2002.13.1.07510.12989/sem.2002.13.1.075 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00011-110.1016/S0141-0296(02)00011-1 ↗
22. 10.12989/sem.2004.18.6.76910.12989/sem.2004.18.6.769 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.002 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(200)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(200) ↗
25. Wang, Y.C. · ACI Structural Journal · 2001 · 98 · 277
26. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.00910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.019 ↗
28. Wang, L.M. · Engineering Structures · 2008 · 30 · 498
29. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.00910.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.009 ↗