Influence of Process Conditions on Tensile Properties Polyoxymethylene Composite
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of process conditions on the tensile properties of polyoxymethylene (POM) composites that contain three amounts of glass fiber-reinforcement (0 wt%, 15 wt% and 25 wt%). Four processing parameters - orientation of fiber, thickness of fiber layer, amount of fiber, and injection molding parameter were considered. The morphology of the fiber layer is observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), to elucidate the correlation between the orientation of the fibers and the mechanism of fracture of the bucking surface. The experimental results show that the maximum ultimate stress is obtained at a filling time of 1.5 s, a melt temperature of 215°C, a mold temperature of 75°C, and a packing pressure 75 MPa. SEM revealed that the composite contained two distinct layers. The fibers in the frozen layer were parallel to the melt flow, while the fiber was perpendicular to the melt flow in the core layer. The thickness of the frozen layer increased with the amount of fiber, increasing tensile strength. Additionally, fiber pullout and across-matrix cracking are the main fracture mechanisms of the frozen layer, whereas failure of the fiber-matrix interface is the major fracture mechanism in the core layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan 320, Republic of China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan 320, Republic of China,
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1097-4628(20001024)78:4<800::AID-APP130>3.0.CO;2-Y10.1002/1097-4628(20001024)78:4<800::AID-APP130>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0035590010.1007/BF00355900 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0142-9418(98)00072-510.1016/S0142-9418(98)00072-5 ↗
4. Kastelic, J. · Polymer Science and Technology · 1983 · 22 · 175
5. 10.1002/pen.1164410.1002/pen.11644 ↗
6. Soundararajan, S. · Polymer Testing · 2001 · 20 · 31310.1016/S0142-9418(00)00037-4 ↗
7. Wilson, G.F. · Automotive Challenge and Plastics Response: Automotive Plastics; RETEC’ · 1987 · 87
8. Bright, P.F.
9. 10.1002/pc.75003020710.1002/pc.750030207 ↗
10. 10.1177/07316844990180050210.1177/073168449901800502 ↗
11. 10.1002/adv.1985.06005010310.1002/adv.1985.060050103 ↗
12. Gupta, M.
13. Damle, M.
14. Gennaro, A. · Plastic & Rubber Processing and Applications · 1988 · 9 · 241
15. Lumini, F. · Plastic & Rubber Processing and Applications · 1998 · 27 · 240
16. 10.1002/pc.1013710.1002/pc.10137 ↗
17. 10.1002/pen.76022090810.1002/pen.760220908 ↗
18. 10.1002/pen.76023140410.1002/pen.760231404 ↗
19. 10.1177/07316844980170180310.1177/073168449801701803 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00041-310.1016/S0043-1648(03)00041-3 ↗
21. 10.1081/PPT-10010002010.1081/PPT-100100020 ↗
22. Tao, K.M. · Lubrication Engineering · 2006 · 9 · 103
23. 10.1016/j.wear.2005.09.03510.1016/j.wear.2005.09.035 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.triboint.2006.08.00310.1016/j.triboint.2006.08.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.wear.2007.06.00510.1016/j.wear.2007.06.005 ↗
26. Annual Book of ASTM Standards · 638 · 44
27. 10.1080/0360255900805063810.1080/03602559008050638 ↗