The influence of interstitial distribution on phase stability and properties of hexagonal ε-Fe6Cx, ε-Fe6Ny and ε-Fe6CxNy phases: A first-principles calculation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract By using the first-principles projector-augmented wave method, the phase stability together with the bulk modulus and magnetic moment have been investigated in binary and ternary interstitial phases e-Fe6Cx, e-Fe6Ny and e-Fe6CxNy (x, y = 0, 1, 2, 3 and x + y ⩽ 3) with a hexagonal structure. The predicted bulk modulus and volume of the e phases increase with increasing the interstitial content, while the calculated magnetic moment decreases. The present work indicates that the longer the distance between the interstitial atoms, the lower the energy of the e phases, i.e. the interaction between the interstitial atoms is of repulsive nature. The presently predicted phase stability of the e-Fe6CxNy phases provides helpful insights into understanding the processes occurring during carbonitriding in steel and the further development of magnetic (carbo)nitrides.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Shang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 240710.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.018 ↗
2. Duman · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 96 · 566810.1063/1.1803634 ↗
3. Gajbhiye · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 201210.1088/0957-4484/16/10/005 ↗
4. Wriedt · Bull Alloy Phase Diagrams · 1987 · 8 · 35510.1007/BF02869273 ↗
5. Du · J Phase Equilibr · 1993 · 14 · 68210.1007/BF02667880 ↗
6. Pekelharing · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 177510.1080/1478643031000097115 ↗
7. Shang · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 359710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00177-0 ↗
8. Cluster approach to order–disorder transformations in alloys
9. Blöchl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
10. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
11. Kresse · Comput Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
12. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
13. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
14. Shang · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 25510.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.009 ↗
15. Teter · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 52 · 806410.1103/PhysRevB.52.8064 ↗
16. Jacobs · J Alloy Compd · 1995 · 227 · 1010.1016/0925-8388(95)01610-4 ↗
17. Jacobs · Mater Sci Forum · 2000 · 325–326 · 11710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.325-326.117 ↗
18. Shang S, Böttger AJ [unpublished].
19. Somers · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 201310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00307-2 ↗
20. Sakuma · J Magn Magn Mater · 1991 · 102 · 12710.1016/0304-8853(91)90277-H ↗
21. Blaha · 2001
22. Mao · J Geophys Res · 1990 · 95 · 2173710.1029/JB095iB13p21737 ↗
23. Uchida · J Geophys Res · 2001 · 106 · 2179910.1029/2001JB000258 ↗