journal article·2012-02

A calibrated Monte Carlo approach to quantify the impacts of misorientation and different driving forces on texture development

Liangzhe Zhang, Anthony D. Rollett, Timothy Bartel, Di Wu, Mark T. Lusk

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

A calibrated Monte Carlo (cMC) approach, which quantifies grain boundary kinetics within a generic setting, is presented. The influence of misorientation is captured by adding a scaling coefficient in the spin flipping probability equation, while the contribution of different driving forces is weighted using a partition function. The calibration process relies on the established parametric links between Monte Carlo (MC) and sharp-interface models. The cMC algorithm quantifies microstructural evolution under complex thermomechanical environments and remedies some of the difficulties associated with conventional MC models. After validation, the cMC approach is applied to quantify the texture development of polycrystalline materials with influences of misorientation and inhomogeneous bulk energy across grain boundaries. The results are in good agreement with theory and experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Humphreys · 2004
2. Kocks · 1998
3. Sun · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 04140210.1103/PhysRevB.79.041402 ↗
4. Abeyaratne · J Mech Phys Solids · 1990 · 38 · 34510.1016/0022-5096(90)90003-M ↗
5. Herring · 1949
6. Herring · 1951
7. Adams · Interface Sci · 1999 · 7 · 32110.1023/A:1008733728830 ↗
8. Lobkovsky · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 28510.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.012 ↗
9. Unverdi · J Comput Phys · 1992 · 100 · 2510.1016/0021-9991(92)90307-K ↗
10. Tryggvason · J Comput Phys · 2001 · 169 · 70810.1006/jcph.2001.6726 ↗
11. Potts · Proc Cambridge Philos Soc · 1952 · 48 · 10610.1017/S0305004100027419 ↗
12. Wu · Rev Modern Phys · 1982 · 54 · 23510.1103/RevModPhys.54.235 ↗
13. Anderson · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 78310.1016/0001-6160(84)90151-2 ↗
14. Srolovitz · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 79310.1016/0001-6160(84)90152-4 ↗
15. Raabe · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 161710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00451-6 ↗
16. Holm · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 298110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00207-5 ↗
17. Rollett · Comput Mater Sci · 2001 · 21 · 6910.1016/S0927-0256(00)00216-0 ↗
18. Gruber · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 610210.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.036 ↗
19. Liu · Phys Rev E · 2002 · 66 · 06160310.1103/PhysRevE.66.061603 ↗
20. Raabe · Philos Mag A · 2009 · 79 · 233910.1080/01418619908214288 ↗
21. Zhang · Comput Mater Sci · 2010 · 48 · 79010.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.034 ↗
22. Metropolis · J Chem Phys · 1953 · 21 · 107810.1063/1.1699114 ↗
23. Onsager · Phys Rev · 1944 · 65 · 11710.1103/PhysRev.65.117 ↗
24. Abraham · Phys Rev Lett · 1974 · 33 · 37710.1103/PhysRevLett.33.377 ↗
25. Fisher · Phys Rev Lett · 1982 · 48 · 36810.1103/PhysRevLett.48.368 ↗
26. Mon · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 39 · 708910.1103/PhysRevB.39.7089 ↗
27. Read · Phys Rev · 1953 · 78 · 27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
28. Pathria · 1996
29. Mon · Phys Rev Lett · 1988 · 60 · 70810.1103/PhysRevLett.60.708 ↗
30. Holm · Phys Rev A · 1991 · 43 · 266210.1103/PhysRevA.43.2662 ↗
31. Rottman · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 29 · 32810.1103/PhysRevB.29.328 ↗
32. Mullins · J Appl Phys · 1956 · 27 · 90010.1063/1.1722511 ↗
33. Lusk · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 99 · 02350510.1063/1.2158141 ↗
34. Gottstein · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 70310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00391-3 ↗
35. Gottstein · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 153510.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.006 ↗
36. Mackenzie · Biometrika · 1958 · 45 · 22910.1093/biomet/45.1-2.229 ↗
37. Winning · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 21110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00321-9 ↗
38. Andersen · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 267310.1016/0956-7151(94)00488-4 ↗
39. Mishra · Mater Sci Technol · 2006 · 22 · 25310.1179/174328406X84094 ↗
40. Gruber · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 1410.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.032 ↗
41. Thompson · J Mech Phys Solids · 1996 · 44 · 65710.1016/0022-5096(96)00022-1 ↗
42. Telang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 226510.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.023 ↗
43. Hofer · Text Microstruct · 1987 · 8–9 · 611
44. Zhang · Comput Mater Sci · 2010 · 48 · 41910.1016/j.commatsci.2010.02.002 ↗
45. Olmsted · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 369410.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
46. Olmsted · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 370410.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
47. Grandi · Phys Rev E · 1997 · 56 · 524010.1103/PhysRevE.56.5240 ↗
48. Landau · 2005
49. Kuprat · SIAM J Sci Comput · 2000 · 22 · 53510.1137/S1064827598348374 ↗
50. Weygand · Philos Mag B · 1999 · 79 · 70310.1080/13642819908205744 ↗
51. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 2 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
52. Gruber · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · 14 · 118910.1088/0965-0393/14/7/007 ↗
53. Tonks · Comput Mater Sci · 2011 · 51 · 2010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.028 ↗
54. Davies · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 36 · 3510.1016/S1359-6462(96)00331-4 ↗