Study on the durability of film adhesively bonded composite joints subjected to environmental aging
Source abstract
Abstract
The research aims to illustrate the effectiveness of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment (APLT) activation in enhancing durability in achieving high performance for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) adhesively bonded joints. The study addresses several crucial aspects, encompassing the surface characterization of different treated CFRP surfaces and durability Wedge Test performance assessments under severe environmental conditions for 576h. To attain this objective, the parameters of APLT were examined alongside chemical isopropanol cleaning and peel-ply methods, considering chemical surface characteristics, as well as the performance of joints under environmental conditions. Observations have indicated that APLT facilitates the formation of polar functional groups with increased oxygen content, improving wettability, and leading to substantial enhancements in durability. Finally, findings from the Wedge Test revealed that APLT demonstrates remarkable endurance under elevated temperature/wet aging conditions. It displayed superior resistance to crack formation and limited propagation, thereby preserving higher fracture toughness energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yıldız Technical University
Turkish Aerospace Industries
Funding
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.01410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.051 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.01410.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.014 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.020 ↗
6. 10.1080/1042691980893525410.1080/10426919808935254 ↗
7. 10.1177/073168442097306610.1177/0731684420973066 ↗
8. 10.1177/0731684424124823610.1177/07316844241248236 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11588110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115881 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11139410.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111394 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10727510.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107275 ↗
13. 10.1177/073168441770349010.1177/0731684417703490 ↗
14. 10.1177/073168441247072710.1177/0731684412470727 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10644310.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106443 ↗
16. 10.1080/00218464.2012.73182810.1080/00218464.2012.731828 ↗
17. 10.1080/01694243.2024.230225910.1080/01694243.2024.2302259 ↗
18. Petrie EM. An introduction to adhesive and sealants. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2020.
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10823710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108237 ↗
20. 10.1177/002199831247015010.1177/0021998312470150 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.08110.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.081 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.306927610.1063/1.3069276 ↗
23. 10.1002/ppap.20170011410.1002/ppap.201700114 ↗
24. 10.1155/2014/32572910.1155/2014/325729 ↗
25. 10.3139/978344644595610.3139/9783446445956 ↗
26. 10.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00009-510.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00009-5 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1203055610.3390/polym12030556 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.02.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.02.007 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-3-030-84936-8_3210.1007/978-3-030-84936-8_32 ↗
30. 10.1080/09276440.2015.105667110.1080/09276440.2015.1056671 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.010 ↗
33. 10.1002/ppap.20220008110.1002/ppap.202200081 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.5410010.1002/app.54100 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym611287510.3390/polym6112875 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.010 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10352110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103521 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10259210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102592 ↗
39. 10.1080/09243046.2024.234583710.1080/09243046.2024.2345837 ↗
40. 10.1520/D7334-08R2210.1520/D7334-08R22 ↗
41. 10.1002/app.1969.07013081510.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
42. ASTM D 5528-01. Standard test method for Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2002.
43. 10.1520/D3762-0310.1520/D3762-03 ↗
44. 10.1177/0731684423116789610.1177/07316844231167896 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.020 ↗
46. 10.1520/D5573-99R1910.1520/D5573-99R19 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.005 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10257010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102570 ↗
49. 10.1177/002199830934534310.1177/0021998309345343 ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1101013910.3390/polym11010139 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14424210.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144242 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10783510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107835 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11056010.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110560 ↗
54. 10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch01110.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch011 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.00410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.004 ↗
56. 10.1002/sia.292310.1002/sia.2923 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.010 ↗
58. 10.1080/0021846060068394410.1080/00218460600683944 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.08510.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.085 ↗
60. 10.1177/0892705723120000910.1177/08927057231200009 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10709710.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107097 ↗
62. 10.1177/0892705723119006810.1177/08927057231190068 ↗
63. 10.1080/00218464.2020.184565910.1080/00218464.2020.1845659 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11005910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110059 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11122510.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111225 ↗