A numerical model for analysis of layer thicknesses on ballistic resistance of a multilayer armor
Source abstract
Abstract
The interest in composite materials, which are lighter and have better mechanical properties (strength, fatigue resistance, corrosion resistance, etc.) than traditional engineering materials, is increasing day by day. In particular, their responses to low or high-velocity impact loads have been among the important research topics of recent years. In this study, unlike the traditional ceramic-based composite armor structures used in the defense industry, the effect of total carbon fibers specifically parallel oriented into impact direction on penetration resistance has been investigated, and penetration resistance of a multilayer hybrid composite armor which is composed of carbon fiber composite blocks sandwiched by two armor steel plates exposed to high-velocity impact has been analyzed numerically. Carbon fibers are normally very brittle to the transverse loading direction, contrarily, to their axial tension or compression direction. This is the reason why it is claimed that this high compression strength property of carbon fibers could be used as a layer in order to replace ceramics in add-on multilayer composite armor. The numerical model created in the ANSYS LS-DYNA program was verified by using the experimental data obtained in an earlier study. The verified numerical model was used to analyze high-velocity impact simulations of multilayer hybrid composite armor for different thicknesses of armor steel to reduce the areal density. By these simulations, minimum areal density compared to Rolled Homogeneous Armor steel for equivalent protection was finally achieved, and thus the hypothesis saying that carbon fibers parallel oriented to impact direction can give high penetration resistance was proved by showing that developed multilayer carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite–armor steel hybrid panels have indicated a better protection level than STANAG 4569 Level-4 with a lower areal density.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Sözen E · J Bartın Fac For · 2016 · 18 · 194
2. Deniz T · 2010
3. Pirvu C · 2018
4. Akella K · J Indian Inst Sci · 2015 · 95 · 297
5. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.03210.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.032 ↗
6. Petrudi AM · Frat Ed Integrita Strutt · 2020 · 54 · 239
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.001 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199831562298210.1177/0021998315622982 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00047-010.1016/S0734-743X(99)00047-0 ↗
10. Jones RM. Mechanics of Composite Materials. 2nd ed. USA: Taylor & Francis, 1999, p. 11.
11. 10.17482/uumfd.49426210.17482/uumfd.494262 ↗
12. Yumak N · Electron J Machine Tech · 2013 · 10 · 1
13. Sikarwar R · Cent Eur J Eng · 2012 · 2 · 638
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10948810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109488 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.04610.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.046 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.013 ↗
18. 10.1007/s40430-021-03139-610.1007/s40430-021-03139-6 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10443-020-09809-310.1007/s10443-020-09809-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.18610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.186 ↗
21. 10.1177/073168442092908410.1177/0731684420929084 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.04510.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.045 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.04510.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.045 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.10.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2010.10.001 ↗
25. Downes D, Bouamoul A, Ensan MN. Three dimensional analysis of induced detonation of cased explosive. In: 13th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, MI, USA, 8–10 June 2014.
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.024 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.02310.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.023 ↗
28. Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands, 19–21 April 1983, pp. 541–547.
29. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11665-013-0583-210.1007/s11665-013-0583-2 ↗
31. ANSYS, Inc · 2015
32. Daniel IM, Ishai O. Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 380.
33. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.09810.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.098 ↗
34. Nato Standard Aep-55 volume 1 · 2014
35. 10.1007/s00170-014-6395-110.1007/s00170-014-6395-1 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.023 ↗
37. 10.5139/IJASS.2010.11.3.22110.5139/IJASS.2010.11.3.221 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10355710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103557 ↗