The influence of serrated flow on necking in tensile specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
Three-dimensional finite element simulations are used to investigate the role of serrated flow on the strain at the onset of necking in a cylindrical uniaxial tension specimen. The material is idealized using a modified form of the McCormick constitutive equation, which has an additional material parameter that allows the rate of transient aging to be varied without affecting its steady-state response. Stability calculations and direct simulations show that, if the transient response is sufficiently slow, serrated flow can be suppressed, even though the material has negative steady-state strain rate sensitivity. This result is then used to determine the effect of suppressing serrated flow on the strain to localization. We find that negative steady-state sensitivity significantly reduces the strain required to initiate necking failure in a tensile specimen. However, the strain to failure is largely unaffected by the transient response of the material, and suppressing the serrated flow in particular has a negligible effect on the localization strain. We conclude that, while both serrated flow and reduced ductility are observed in materials with negative rate sensitivity, the reduction in ductility is not a direct consequence of serrated flow. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Portevin · Comptes rendus de l-Academie des sciences, Paris · 1923 · 176 · 507
2. Trojanova · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 79310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.12.048 ↗
3. Kang · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 49910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.05.010 ↗
4. Hopperstad · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2007 · 15 · 74710.1088/0965-0393/15/7/004 ↗
5. Hahner · Mater Sci Eng A · 1996 · 207 · 20810.1016/0921-5093(95)10033-4 ↗
6. Hahner · Mater Sci Eng A · 1996 · 207 · 21610.1016/0921-5093(95)10032-6 ↗
7. Hahner · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 369510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00066-9 ↗
8. Zhang · Int J Numer Meth Eng · 2011 · 86 · 7010.1002/nme.3047 ↗
9. Soare · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 409110.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.030 ↗
10. Soare · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 404610.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.027 ↗
11. McCormick · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 306110.1016/0001-6160(88)90043-0 ↗
12. Hähner · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 13410910.1103/PhysRevB.65.134109 ↗
13. Kok · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 365110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00114-9 ↗
14. Lebyodkin · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 52910.1016/S1359-6454(00)00067-7 ↗
15. Rizzi · Int J Plasticity · 2004 · 20 · 12110.1016/S0749-6419(03)00035-4 ↗
16. Benallal · Int J Plasticity · 2008 · 24 · 191610.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.008 ↗
17. Benallal · Phil Mag · 2008 · 88 · 331110.1080/14786430802468223 ↗
18. Bertram · Proc Appl Math Mech · 2006 · 6 · 35310.1002/pamm.200610158 ↗
19. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 221910.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.029 ↗
20. Dierke · Comp Mater Sci · 2007 · 39 · 10610.1016/j.commatsci.2006.03.019 ↗
21. Fressengeas · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400-401 · 22610.1016/j.msea.2005.02.073 ↗
22. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 108710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00380-3 ↗
23. Mazière · Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng · 2010 · 199 · 73410.1016/j.cma.2009.11.004 ↗
24. Böhlke · Comp Mater Sci · 2009 · 44 · 107610.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.036 ↗
25. Benallal · Eur J Mech A: Solids · 2006 · 25 · 39710.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.10.007 ↗
26. Mesarovic · J Mech Phys Solids · 1995 · 43 · 67110.1016/0022-5096(95)00010-G ↗
27. Hutchinson · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 83910.1016/0001-6160(77)90168-7 ↗