Effect of kinematic stability of initial orientation on deformation heterogeneity and ductile failure in duplex stainless steel during uniaxial tension
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The crystal plasticity finite element method (CPFEM) was used to investigate the effect of the kinematic stability of the initial orientations on the deformation heterogeneity and ductile failure of ferrite and austenite phases in duplex stainless steel (DSS) during uniaxial tension. The individual stress–strain relationships of ferrite and austenite phases in DSS were evaluated via in situ neutron diffraction in combination with the CPFEM. A CPFEM based on the volume elements (VEs) of a unit cell of DSS with a regular banded microstructure demonstrated that the kinematic stability of the initial orientations significantly affected the deformation heterogeneity and ductile failure in the constituent phases in VEs during uniaxial tension. The regions susceptible to ductile failure were identified as being in the austenite phase near the phase boundaries of ferrite and austenite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Gunn · 1997
2. Choi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 601210.1016/j.msea.2011.04.038 ↗
3. Choi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2012 · 534 · 67310.1016/j.msea.2011.12.025 ↗
4. Choi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2012 · 535 · 3210.1016/j.msea.2011.12.037 ↗
5. Herrera · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 465310.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.011 ↗
6. Remy · Mater Sci Eng · 1977 · 28 · 9910.1016/0025-5416(77)90093-3 ↗
7. Byun · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 306310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00117-4 ↗
8. Park · Met Mater Int · 2010 · 16 · 110.1007/s12540-010-0001-3 ↗
9. Baczmański · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 113310.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.046 ↗
10. Jia · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 390710.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.019 ↗
11. Jia · Metall Trans A · 2008 · 39 · 313410.1007/s11661-008-9675-2 ↗
12. Jia · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 491 · 42510.1016/j.msea.2008.02.021 ↗
13. Hedström · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 73410.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.053 ↗
14. Dingley · J Microsc · 2004 · 213 · 21410.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01321.x ↗
15. Hutchings · 2005
16. Woo · J Appl Crystallogr · 2011 · 44 · 74710.1107/S0021889811018899 ↗
17. Woo · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 697210.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.054 ↗
18. ABAQUS User’s manual, version 6.8. Providence. RI: Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorenson; 2008.
19. Asaro · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 92310.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-9 ↗
20. Choi · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 177510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00576-1 ↗
21. Choi · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 194710.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.034 ↗
22. Peirce · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 195110.1016/0001-6160(83)90014-7 ↗
23. Hosford · 1993
24. Hutchinson · Proc R Soc of London A · 1976 · 348 · 10110.1098/rspa.1976.0027 ↗
25. Pan · Int J Solids Struct · 1983 · 19 · 97310.1016/0020-7683(83)90023-9 ↗
26. Kalidindi · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 53710.1016/0022-5096(92)80003-9 ↗
27. Matthies · 1987 · vols. I–III
28. Francois · Text Microstruct · 1991 · 14 · 18
29. Moverare · Mater Sci Eng A · 2002 · 337 · 2510.1016/S0921-5093(02)00022-9 ↗
30. Kanjarla · Int J Plast · 2010 · 26 · 122010.1016/j.ijplas.2009.05.005 ↗
31. Kadkhodapour · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 257510.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.039 ↗
32. Choi · Int J Plast · 2013 · 45 · 8510.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.013 ↗
33. Choi · Met Mater Int · 1997 · 3 · 25210.1007/BF03025932 ↗
34. Choi · Int J Mech Sci · 2000 · 42 · 157110.1016/S0020-7403(99)00091-0 ↗
35. Toth · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 307710.1016/0001-6160(88)90045-4 ↗
36. Wierzbanowski · Cryst Res Technol · 1984 · 19 · 20110.1002/crat.2170190211 ↗
37. Baczynski · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 427310.1016/1359-6454(96)00114-0 ↗
38. Jorge-Badiola · J Microscopy · 2007 · 228 · 37310.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01850.x ↗