journal article·2003-02

High Strain Compression Response of Affordable Woven Carbon/Epoxy Composites

M. V. Hosur, J. Alexander, S. Jeelani, U. K. Vaidya, A. Mayer

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper discusses the experimental study on the response of affordable plain and satin weave carbon/epoxy composite laminates subjected to high strain rate compression loading using a modified Compression Split Hopkinson’s Pressure Bar (SHPB). 37 layer laminates were manufactured using aerospace grade woven fabrics with SC-15 epoxy resin system utilizing Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion Molding (VARIM) approach. Samples were subjected to high strain rate compression loading at five different strain rates ranging from 17/s to 817/s in the in-plane as well as through-the-thickness directions using a modified SHPB that facilitates controlled single pulse loading of the sample. High strain rate response was compared with that of static compression. Optical microscopy was used to characterize the failure mechanisms. Results of the study indicate considerable increase in dynamic compression peak stress as compared to static loading, whereas the strain at peak stress was lower by 35-65%. Samples loaded through-the-thickness exhibit higher peak stresses as compared to those loaded in the in-plane direction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Advanced Materials, Tuskegee University Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA

Department of Materials and Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

Air Force Research Laboratory, VASD, WPAFB, OH 45433, USA

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.310186010.1115/1.3101860 ↗
2. 10.1520/CTR10384J10.1520/CTR10384J ↗
3. Monteal, D.M. · 1992 · 54
4. 10.1016/0010-4361(93)90042-710.1016/0010-4361(93)90042-7 ↗
5. Powers, B.M. · 179
6. 6. Powers, B.M. and Vinson, J.R. (1996). In: Allen, H.G. (ed.), Sandwich Construction, 3rd Edn. England: Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Ltd. pp. 769-778.
7. 7. Woldenbet, E. and Vinson, J.R. (1997). In: Proc. of 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struc. Struc. Dyn. and Matl. Conf. 2: 927-934.
8. 8. Preissner, E.C., Woldesenbet, E. and Vinson, J.R. (1997). In: Proc. of 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struc. Struc. Dyn. and Matl. Conf. 2: 935-944.
9. 9. Vinson, J.R. and Woldesenbet, E. (1998). Proceedings of American Society for Composites 13th Technical Conference. Baltimore. pp. 1700-1706.
10. 10. Dee, A.T., Vinson, J.R. and Zedelmayer, E. (1998). Proceedings of American Society for Composites 13th Technical Conference. Baltimore. pp. 1707-1731.
11. 11. Waas, A.M., Takeda, N., Yuan, J. and Lee, S.H. (1997). Proceedings 12th Annual Technical American Society for Composites Conference. Dearborn. pp. 552-561.
12. 10.1177/00219983990330170310.1177/002199839903301703 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.281240310.1115/1.2812403 ↗
14. 14. Vaidya, U.K., Jadhav, N.C., Hosur, M.V., Gillespie, Jr. J.W. and Fink, B.K. (1999). In: Proceedings of American Society for Composites 14th Technical Conference, Fairborn. pp. 141-151.
15. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00183-810.1016/S0266-3538(97)00183-8 ↗
16. 16. Ninan, L. and Sun, C.T. (1998). In: Proceedings of American Society for Composites 13th Technical Conference. Baltimore. pp. 1732-1745.
17. 10.1098/rspa.1991.015010.1098/rspa.1991.0150 ↗
18. Schwartz, M.M. · 1996
19. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00031-910.1016/S0263-8223(01)00031-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00102-510.1016/S1359-835X(99)00102-5 ↗
21. 10.1080/0021846950801518810.1080/00218469508015188 ↗