journal article·2025-09

Investigating fiber cutting at the composite grid intersections on the mechanical performance of laminates

Yu Gao, Shiyang Zhu, Kaiyan Min, Xiaowen Song, Han Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Cutting of fibers at the intersections could effectively mitigate problems associated with fiber accumulation in thick ribs of composite grids. However, the effectiveness varies according to the different rib cutting angles in the structure. Therefore, five different cutting samples with cutting angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° were prepared in this study. Concurrently, numerical model for the tensile and compressive behavior of samples with fiber cutting was established considering zero-thickness interface elements. The results indicated that as the cutting angle decreased, the compressive strength of the ribs gradually increased, while the changes in tensile strength were not significant. Two distinctive failure modes were identified, namely, delamination-dominant failure (observed in 90°, 75°, and 60° cutting specimens) and fiber-breakage-dominant failure (manifested in 45° and 30° cutting specimens). Finally, it was concluded that reducing the cutting angle between ribs can effectively enhanced compressive strength, and a slight improvement in tensile strength was seen when the angle was not less than 45°. These findings offer valuable insights for designing and manufacturing composite grid structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for High Performance Fiber Composites, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Fiber Materials, Key Laboratory of High-Performance Fibers & Products, Ministry of Education, Center for Civil Aviation Composites, Key Laboratory of Shanghai City for Lightweight Composites, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Lnstitute, Wuhan, China

State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, BIC-ESAT, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11864910.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118649 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11699310.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116993 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.09.00810.1016/j.tws.2016.09.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11385910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113859 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/s1359-8368(02)00074-410.1016/s1359-8368(02)00074-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.020 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10732110.1016/j.tws.2020.107321 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10767110.1016/j.tws.2021.107671 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10443-023-10103-110.1007/s10443-023-10103-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.09.01810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.09.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.08.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.08.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10598010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105980 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.01110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00009-510.1016/S0020-7403(98)00009-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.01.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.01.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.07.00210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.07.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10661310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106613 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10656710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106567 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10578310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105783 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10625110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106251 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10534010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105340 ↗
23. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.01110.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.011 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10505710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105057 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.023 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.01910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10781510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107815 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11870710.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118707 ↗
30. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11184510.1016/j.tws.2024.111845 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10973110.1016/j.tws.2022.109731 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10713210.1016/j.tws.2020.107132 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10652810.1016/j.tws.2019.106528 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11023710.1016/j.tws.2022.110237 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.04610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.046 ↗
37. 10.1177/002199831245447810.1177/0021998312454478 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10775210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107752 ↗
39. 10.2514/1.4124410.2514/1.41244 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.07.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2006.07.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.11011310.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110113 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10814210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108142 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.00610.1016/j.tws.2017.06.006 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.04010.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.040 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.003 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10845210.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108452 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11310610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113106 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.12310.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.123 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10443-010-9179-210.1007/s10443-010-9179-2 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10443-020-09836-010.1007/s10443-020-09836-0 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10443-017-9614-810.1007/s10443-017-9614-8 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10443-016-9540-110.1007/s10443-016-9540-1 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10443-017-9658-910.1007/s10443-017-9658-9 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11435110.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114351 ↗
55. ASTM Committee D30. D3039/D3039M: standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Annu Book ASTM Stand 2017; 15: 1–13.
56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10833510.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108335 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10443-024-10221-410.1007/s10443-024-10221-4 ↗
58. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.012 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.005 ↗
61. Standard A. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (CLC) test fixture[J]. Astm, 2009.
62. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-610.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
63. 10.1016/0266-3538(88)90043-710.1016/0266-3538(88)90043-7 ↗
64. ASTM D. 7291. Stand test method through-thickness “flatwise” tensile strength elastic modul a fiber-reinforced polym matrix. Compos Mater Am Soc Test Mater 2007.
65. 10.1007/s00170-016-8613-510.1007/s00170-016-8613-5 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.022 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11479210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114792 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.05.01010.1016/j.tws.2019.05.010 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.06410.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.064 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11087110.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110871 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11237610.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112376 ↗